29.04.2014 12:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
So, i see autocommit as only possibility, if we choose Oracle way
Out of curiosity, why cannot it be done in a separate *non-system*
transaction? I.e. instead of committing user transaction start we and
immediately commit a new one.
Technically
OK, the alternative to record lookups is to store the transaction id in
index. This would require an index insertion for all indexes defined on
a table even if the key value didn't change. It would also require a
corresponding index deletion for each index defined on the table when a
3. Does sorting use pointers to row sort data or are the rows moved in
memory during sort?
Rows are moved. This is done this way to avoid duplicated record fetches
(when sort results are retrieved) causing random I/O. Sorting itself may
be also highly I/O bound, but it always operates
AFAIK, transformation of string into key is up to ICU which does not provide
a way for
backward transformation.
INTL collations are a separate beast, I'm more interested in simpler
datatypes. If we could mark at least some indices as decodable, it
would already be a step forward.
On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:38:16 +0300, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
This leads me to the questions:
1) When are prepared or rolled back transactions removed from
RDB$TRANSACTIONS? Or are they kept indefinitely?
Its never removed. And i see no problem with it.
I was a bit wrong - when
I will see if I can come up with a solution for Firebird 3 without needing
RDB$TRANSACTIONS to be unprotected, but doesn't - potentially - degenerate
to iterating over a list of thousands if not millions of transaction
records when recovering a distributed transaction.
Am i already told
On 5/2/2014 3:25 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
OK, the alternative to record lookups is to store the transaction id in
index. This would require an index insertion for all indexes defined on
a table even if the key value didn't change. It would also require a
corresponding index deletion for each
On Sat, 10 May 2014 13:46:46 +0300, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Surprise : after you got list of tx numbers it can be used to query
RDB$TRANSACTIONS for additional info.
But then I could just as well query RDB$TRANSACTIONS directly. I don't
know the Firebird transaction id: I need to identify
After thinking more on it...
I could (with FB 2.5 and later) also query with
RDB$TRANSACTION_DESCRIPTION = X'' (where X'' is the serialized Xid
I am looking for) although I wonder about its performance implications. On
the other hand, recovery situations should be rare so it might
In short: blob id which going version is referring to can cleaned only if
it is not
referred by both previous or next versions. All other versions are irrelevant
because they
cannot refer the same blob id. At least in current codebase which creates a
new copy of
blob content on
10.05.2014 15:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Here you wrong: if blob contents was not changed by update, there will
be no new blob.
Yes, and in this case blob cannot be garbage collected because next record
version
refers to it. No need to analyze whole versions chain (collect staying
is your scenario even possible?
wouldn't the engine report an update collision when update version3 was
attempted?
Since tx2 is read-committed and tx4 is already committed - yes, it is
possible.
Regards,
Vlad
11.05.2014 0:18, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is wrong for lost update scenario, which is allowed for
read-committed transactions:
att1: start tx1, insert version1 (blob1), commit tx1
att1: start tx2 (read-committed), read version1 (blob1)
att2: start tx4, update version2 (blob2), commit
11.05.2014 16:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
11.05.2014 10:44, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
It is better to write application to test it. And application
should be clever enough
to be able to put already read blob_id into parameter instead of
creating new blob_id.
I tested with attached
12.05.2014 17:11, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello, All.
Similar logic as described in subj can be found also in expunge(). Record
is deleted
from data page first and only then garbage in index is collected. May it be
another source
of the problem?
Sure. And this is why i
If a record has uncommitted head version created by active transaction and
some garbage
in backversions tail, can anyone (background GC thread, sweep or parallel
transaction)
wipe this garbage from the tail while the transaction is still active?
Yes
I can't understand why
13.05.2014 13:36, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Yes
How? If I remember your lesson right, garbage in a record is collected only
if head
version is marked with transaction number lesser that OAT.
This is a most often case. But, if you look at VIO_chase_record_version,
you'll see
12.05.2014 16:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Sure. And this is why i wrote recently
currently used way of GC ... not 100% safe in highly concurrent
environment.
Can this case be fixed by moving call to delete_record() below
garbage_collect()?
Something like
13.05.2014 14:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Your code will leave record with broken backversion pointer in case of
failure while garbage_collect is running. To avoid this, we need to zero
backpointer before
garbage_collect. It also have risk to create orphan backversions but it is
not a big
Firebird::Stack implements LIFO list. Is there a ready to use template for
FIFO list?
Any Array could by used as FIFO list
Regards,
Vlad
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Hello, All.
In Firebird 3.0 following script works differently from 2.5. Is it expected
side-effect
of cursor stability?
If you really interested in answer and respect other list members, add
results of your
scripts here to not force others to do what you already did.
Regards,
10.05.2014 14:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
As for A-B-A
updates i see no problem as there will be 3 separate index entries with own
tx numbers. Currently we also have 3 index entires for such scenario, btw.
Old IB's optimization to not store existing key second time is not working
2.5 result:
Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 22012
arithmetic exception, numeric overflow, or string truncation
-Integer divide by zero. The code attempted to divide an integer value by
an integer divisor of zero.
-At trigger 'DBL_BOOM' line: 7, col: 4
After line 17 in file u_dbl_test.sql
14.05.2014 18:10, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
I'd said it is really because cursor stability. Looks like top-level
update ignores update of record
with ID = 2, made by trigger.
Not only this. Two new versions of the record were created instead of one
(because
update_in_place() wasn't
I would like to submit an attached patch. It does following things:
I'll look at it but don't expect quick review.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly
Yes, it's a bit mask. See the constants:
Shouldn't it be present in RDB$TYPES, as all other special numbers ?
Regards,
Vlad
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run
23.05.2014 12:43, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
23.05.2014 11:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
It's not absolutely required to have bigint column - it's enough to
store bit number, which is less than 64.
It makes impossible to use JOIN to retrieve trigger's type via SQL query.
In this case
there
we've started validation of FB built on Linux and we met this situation:
fb_inet_server hangs instead of returning the error on this query:
insert into s select * from s
It not hungs, it insert rows until disk have space :) What kind of error
do you expect here ?
It is well known
21.06.2014 0:52, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
Hello, All!
We have encountered subtle errors and data corruptions when using complex
triggers/stored procedures in READ COMMITTED
transactions.
I assume you tell about logical data corruptions, not physical, correct ?
Most applied programmers
AFAIK, concurrent GC in pre-committed transactions without transaction lock
was unsafe, and created
permanently broken databases.
I believe corruption has become especially apparent after commit intended to
fix CORE-3515. I don't
know who fixed it, but Red Soft builds include a patch for
25.06.2014 12:52, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
25.06.2014 11:46, Roman Simakov wrote:
2014-06-25 12:09 GMT+04:00 Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com:
In this case why to use READ COMMITED transaction at all?..
Because opening cursor is not opening transaction. You can have long
transaction
23.06.2014 20:41, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
Hello, Dmitry!
On 06/23/2014 04:15 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
21.06.2014 01:52, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
I attach patch for this functionality to give you an idea of
implementation. It depends on a couple other changes so it doesn't apply
to FB2.5
01.07.2014 9:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 06/30/14 17:50, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
30.06.2014 15:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 06/30/14 17:40, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
It makes issues with plugins harder to detect and diagnose.
Yes, but the reason was also rather strong - make it
- Original Message -
From: Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] setCursorName in IResultSet rather thanIStatement
On 23-7-2014 17:59,
On 24-7-2014 19:27, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
As far as I understand it, you can't have an IResultSet unless the
result set is open, so setting the cursor name on an IResultSet is not
very logical.
What about more than one simultaneously active result set produced by
the same statement
However, apparently FB devs don't think it's important to keep it in
sync with the C++ interface - even if third parties could submit patches
for that.
This is not true
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing
11.08.2014 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
11.08.2014 13:39, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
As you already 'discovered' absence
of not needed QueryInterface in our classes, you should understand why it
was not a mistake.
It wasn't a mistake for Delphi only. It failed for FPC.
I don't have
11.08.2014 17:47, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
11.08.2014 18:18, Jim Starkey wrote:
Since plugins pretty much need to be compiled with the same compiler as the
engine
Very questionable requirement. I can easily expect plugins written in
Delphi.
Agree. More, there is no reason to use same C++
07.09.2014 17:27, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hi, All.
I see that flag large scan is set for blob reading only if reader is
gbak or size of
blob is bigger than page cache.
Doesn't it mean that reading of BLOB that is little smaller than page
cache will flush
whole shared cache
08.09.2014 10:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
08.09.2014 8:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Corresponding number of LRU pages will be evicted, yes.
I cannot imagine an application pattern that read the same BLOB
repeatedly. Can you?
May be it has sense to cache only BLOB pointer pages
All
Implementation is committed (see CORE-4556).
Regards,
Vlad
PS ODS changed !
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
In a similar vein, if Firebird is still using the venerable Quick Sort
that a coded more or less straight from Knuth, Volume 2, in 1984, see
Bentley McIlroy's Engineering a Sort Function for a must faster
version. If anyone is interested, I've turned it into a C++ template,
which I'd be
26.09.2014 13:27, marius adrian popa :
I have seen this patch for openjdk
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-September/008685.html
Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
06.10.2014 12:48, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
06.10.2014 11:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
Any clue?
Add -user SYSDBA
Same error:
C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_3_0gsec -add SYSDBA -pw masterkey -user
SYSDBA
An error occurred while attempting to add
09.10.2014 18:02, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 10/09/14 16:57, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello, All.
Is following warning safe?
Generating parse.cpp and dsql.tab.h
warning - the symbol db_ddl_privilege is undefined
C:\Users\SD\MYDOCU~1\firebird\temp\Win32\debug\btyacc\btyacc: 2 rules
When we decided not to validate constraints on declaration, our reasoning
was that computations and database access were expensive and any decent
application programmer or DBA would always validate constraints before
declaring them and control access to the constrained items until the
18.11.2014 17:39, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 18/11/2014 09:00, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
While it makes sense to have a single official VS projects files based
on a fully free VS, since Microsoft do not learned how to support the
same files in multiple versions, it does not have any
19.11.2014 11:01, liviuslivius wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded today FB 3.0.0.31439 - but i can not connect to it
And i do not see 3050 listen port with netstat -a
I try also run firebird.exe -a - without succes - it start but not listen
3 days ago there were no problems.
environment WinXP 32bit
I
19.11.2014 11:42, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:01:32AM +0100, liviuslivius wrote:
I downloaded today FB 3.0.0.31439 - but i can not connect to it
And i do not see 3050 listen port with netstat -a
Does setting RemoteBindAddress 127.0.0.1 in firebird.conf help?
No. And
19.11.2014 12:00, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:56 +0200, Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sf.net
wrote:
Lets play devils advocate:
Do we want to continue to support Windows XP? It is end-of-life, no
longer
receives security updates and should therefor be considered insecure
19.11.2014 12:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:44:04 +0200, Vlad Khorsun hv...@optima.com.ua
wrote:
19.11.2014 12:30, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:19:36 +0200, Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sf.net
wrote:
Do you really propose us to drop support of OS just
19.11.2014 13:52, Michal Kubecek wrote:
Could you please try attached patch? It uses AF_UNSPEC in getaddrinfo()
hints whenever host string is non-empty and retries getaddrinfo() with
AF_UNSPEC if AF_INET6 fails for empty host string.
It doesn't look at error codes and tries to guess what
19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek wrote:
Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
Windows XP without IPv6 support?
Unfortunately - no. I have no XP machine right now.
The way I read the manual page it
should but I would rather make sure.
Agree here.
Regards,
19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek пишет:
Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
Windows XP without IPv6 support? The way I read the manual page it
should but I would rather make sure.
On W2K3 without IPv6 i see that getaddrinfo() returns 0 and gai_result
contains
21.11.2014 12:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello, All.
In current trunk if next page is already full, ppg_min_space got frozen,
causin
unnecessary loops in locate_space().
It is not frozen, of course, but not advanced up to the next non-full slot -
here
you are correct.
21.11.2014 12:30, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
21.11.2014 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Sorry, but this is bad code. It doesn't check for number of slots on PP
and allows
unlimited grow of ppg_min_space.
No, ppg_min_space cannot grow more than slot+1, exactly as it was in
version 2.5
21.11.2014 13:11, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:03:12AM +0200, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek пишет:
Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
Windows XP without IPv6 support? The way I read the manual page it
should but I
21.11.2014 13:59, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
You are right
Good to know :) Patch is committed, check it please.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate!
Hi all.
Recently wire compression was implemented by Alex. It uses well known zlib
library. On Linux zlib could be installed as a standalone package and there
is no problems with its presence nor for Firebird users, nor for those who
going to build Firebird. But on Windows i found no common
28.11.2014 14:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 28/11/2014 09:39, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Hi all.
Recently wire compression was implemented by Alex. It uses well known
zlib
library. On Linux zlib could be installed as a standalone package and there
is no problems with its
01.12.2014 19:41, Fabiano Kureck - Desenvolvimento SCI wrote:
How can I enable wire compression? I downloaded Firebird today, and not found
any documentation about that (That I can found).
Windows build was committed just today, don't hurry ;) Try next snapshot
build
and look for
09.12.2014 21:58, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
is somwhere FB3 embeded version to download?
There is no more separate embedded version. Just stop (or don't start) server
and use local connection string.
Regards,
Vlad
PS re-read the Release Notes, page 6 : The Providers
10.12.2014 10:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Looks like server can not find/access security database, may be it
locates firebird root folder incorrectly.
Is there firebird info in your host's registry?
a) server not used registry to locate root directory for a very long time
b) client not used
13.12.2014 10:29, Claudio Valderrama C. пишет:
People, can someone explain how does this work? Probably it's obvious but I
couldn't find the answer myself.
GarbageCollector::~GarbageCollector()
{
SyncLockGuard exGuard(m_sync, SYNC_EXCLUSIVE,
GarbageCollector::~GarbageCollector);
16.12.2014 11:13, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:03:39 +0200, Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sf.net
wrote:
16.12.2014 10:27, Rudolf Grauberger wrote:
I would like to read the table aliases,
After call of isc_dsql_prepare() you'll have XSQLDA structure filled
with all
info
18.12.2014 9:53, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
Some times ago I'm send patch to
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4619
Will be it applied?
Done.
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT
18.12.2014 10:30, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
From 99c644e7ae0a87573f51d088973e6e43da944e2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexpux alexey.paw...@gmail.com mailto:alexey.paw...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:17:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Mingw don't support Win98.
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
18.12.2014 10:21, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
Mingw also have posix threads library so to resolve conflict we need guard
using
posix threads for Windows.
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free
22.12.2014 16:02, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
c:\users\sd\my documents\firebird\extern\icu\include\unicode\umachine.h(200):
error C2146:
syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'UBool'
...and so on. Could somebody fix it?..
Should be already fixed.
Regards,
Vlad
27.12.2014 12:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I have a weird problem. In a test I am writing a blob of 24576 bytes.
This is done in a write (isc_put_segment) of 16384 and 8192 bytes.
If I subsequently query the blob for the length
(isc_info_blob_total_length), I receive the correct number in the
02.01.2015 17:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 28-12-2014 14:07, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
27.12.2014 12:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I have a weird problem. In a test I am writing a blob of 24576 bytes.
This is done in a write (isc_put_segment) of 16384 and 8192 bytes.
If I subsequently query the blob
AFAIK, client library parse info buffer anyway, so may be it should add
unflushed info
to the counter?..
For what ?
Regards,
Vlad
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
05.02.2015 14:36, Geoff Worboys wrote:
Hi,
Firebird v2.5.3
I've been studying the source trying to understand the reasons
behind a particular aspect of EXECUTE STATEMENT with ON EXTERNAL.
Specifically, why are USER PASSWORD and ROLE tied together here?
Why do you think so ? See below:
18.02.2015 15:46, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
To avoid this message you could start second instance with XNET disabled.
To do it, specify switch -i in command line. Of course, it will disable
local protocol for this instance. It is disabled in any case, btw, but you
can explicitly
22.03.2015 12:43, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
I can't exactly recall concrete numbers from the past, but I wonder if
Firebird can currently go beyond 10MB/s disk I/O utilization. And this
is not about being limited by spinning disk and seek time (random I/O).
You'll be wonder if reevaluate
22.03.2015 13:44, Thomas Steinmaurer пишет:
Vlad,
I can't exactly recall concrete numbers from the past, but I wonder if
Firebird can currently go beyond 10MB/s disk I/O utilization. And this
is not about being limited by spinning disk and seek time (random I/O).
You'll be wonder if
17.03.2015 22:08, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
It would be easy if you share your current code in a github.
Adriano
Nothing to share for this little problem ;-)
try this:
//bufor
GenRowsInMessage = Array[0..100] of Byte;
//proc in db
create procedure gen_rows_pascal (
17.03.2015 11:54, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
After re-reading docs
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE6/en/Internal_Data_Formats#Record_Types
i'd say you should not use nor special(explicit) alignment nor packed
records. Just ensure you have {$A+} when record type is
17.03.2015 12:45, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
i assign it to whole record not for member by member
So, you don't know what values should be in what member ?
but how offsets can hange any in this representation?
It show us exactly how compiler works
I should do for one integer
22.03.2015 15:21, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
I'm confused. ;-)
Sorry ;)
With FB 2.5.2 SC 64-bit on Windows 7 Prof.
While copying a 18GB database from folder A to B on the same spinning
physical disk at ~33MB/s read + ~33MB/s write, thus 66MB/s total, doing
a select count(*) on that
22.02.2015 20:11, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
A solution must be to pass a parameter to destroy methods specifying if
they should release or not the object.
Must be ? I don't think so. I'm not ready to point to correct solution
right now, but additional parameter is not a solution,
24.02.2015 18:30, Ivan Přenosil wrote:
Hi,
What may be the reason that sweep does not start automatically in FB3 ?
I have sweep interval set to 2, and the difference between OIT/OAT is
4.
When I connect to similar database using FB2.5 I immediately see SWEEPER in
rdb$attachments.
05.06.2015 10:42, liviuslivius wrote:
...
C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_3gsec -add SYSDBA -pw masterkey -admin yes
An error occurred while attempting to add the user.
no permission for INSERT access to TABLE PLG$VIEW_USERS
...
How can i add sysdba? What are the reall steps?
You must
11.06.2015 13:44, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11/06/2015 06:08, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
10.06.2015 21:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
At a first look, boost.regex is the library who can do it. It's
templatized and works with iterators and traits for customization. It
has
30.05.2015 11:29, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
To better understand the implications of the pull request by Maxim, I'd
like to know the semantics of isc_tpb_autocommit. Is this documented
anywhere?
AFAIR, no
I'd especially like to know at which point the commit is executed, and
the impact this
29.05.2015 17:10, Maxim Smyatkin wrote:
2. Whole TestFBBlobStream family (6 tests) fails. The reason is bug in
Firebird transaction engine. When transaction started in
auto-commit mode actually commits (via commit_retaining) it doesn't free any
resources. E.g., what happens in these tests
01.07.2015 16:34, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
01.07.2015 13:49, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys.
Except BIGINT, IIRC.
Correct.
Regards,
Vlad
PS One can find
01.07.2015 12:14, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
Firebird allows me to change domain's datatype even if column with this
domain is used in an index.
Is it OK or should the index be dropped and created again?
If new datatype is the same from index POV, there is no need to rebuild
index.
01.07.2015 13:34, Jiří Činčura wrote:
If new datatype is the same from index POV, there is no need to rebuild
index.
Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys. So, in the
case above there
28.07.2015 20:12, Paul Reeves wrote:
I managed to accidentally create this pseudo config file today:
database mydb
enabled false
blah blah
/database
database mydb
enabled true
blah blah
/database
and was very surprised to find no trace output for mydb. After a lot of head
30.07.2015 19:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
What's the point to have system transaction read-write?
I will celebrate when (if) it will be readonly.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
30.07.2015 19:01, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes пишет:
Hi!
I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
considering dbb-readOnly() flag.
And it worked (changed the database) and committed the change.
Shouldn't that be prevent in lower layers?
Then I chmod -w the database.
26.07.2015 12:08, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 25-7-2015 15:08, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
25.07.2015 15:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
How would I go about that if none of the errors in that facility are
defined inside Firebird,
We could define and reserve facility code for Jaybird and let you
27.07.2015 1:24, Ann Harrison wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Or is there a reason to ignore those higher bits for the facility and
code?
I have no idea why ENCODE_ISC_MSG written in this way.
CLASS_MASK seems to not be used
25.07.2015 14:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Up to now Jaybird has always used the Firebird error codes, or specific
error messages defined in code.
I am currently looking into defining some Jaybird specific error codes,
with associated messages and SQL states.
Are you going to report is using
14.07.2015 16:09, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
I just downloaded today's Win32 FB 3 snapshot
(Firebird-3.0.0.31940-0_Win32.7z) and extracted it to an empty
directory.
When I try gsec -add sysdba -pw masterkey -user sysdba (no Firebird
process running), the command prompt never return.
Should
28.10.2015 13:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> I notice that you use the new API. What happens if you use the old API?
Speaking about *dll unload* - i think nothing should be changed.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel
17.10.2015 1:21, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Just for info - I'll look into it
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
21.10.2015 14:44, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> Subj, actually, on Windows with MSVC 2010 Express.
It is already built with .pdb files. Look in /temp
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing
28.10.2015 10:36, Arno Brinkman wrote:
Hi,
Latest snapshot build Firebird-3.0.0.32134-0_Win32.zip using the
fbclient.dll
Still 500ms for unloading the fbclient.dll :-(
I can't reproduce it. How did you measure unload delay ?
Regards,
Vlad
PS I've attached source code of my tiny test
201 - 300 of 1074 matches
Mail list logo
