> Instead of get from info and pass "everything" (possible MBs?) in the
> TPB, isn't possible to pass only the "base transaction number" of cloned
> transaction, and them the engine instances dumps necessary information,
> like with monitoring, so the new transaction could reconstruct the snapshot?
> Please leave this ticket / patch up to me.
This is the first reasonable idea at this branch of thread ;)
Regards,
Vlad
--
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continu
> Unfortunately, rdb$backup_history is the only sys gen that's not modified
> from an internal request.
Time to use triggers and INSERT RETURNING ? :)
Regards,
Vlad
--
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development
>> > Unfortunately, rdb$backup_history is the only sys gen
>> that's not modified
>> > from an internal request.
>>
>> Time to use triggers and INSERT RETURNING ? :)
>
> Or let VIO_store() handle rel_backup_history and do the generator increment
> from set_metadata_id().
Agree.
Regard
>> >> > Unfortunately, rdb$backup_history is the only sys gen
>> >> that's not modified
>> >> > from an internal request.
>> >>
>> >> Time to use triggers and INSERT RETURNING ? :)
>> >
>> > Or let VIO_store() handle rel_backup_history and do the
>> generator increment
>> > from set_metadat
>> I see that icuin30.dll is tried to be loaded from various places
>> (although excluding the embedded root path), but this fails.
>>
>> icuin30.dll is available in the embedded root directory. When I put the
>> dll into the application sub-folder, then the trace output works.
>>
>> Can you please
>> I know people will feel outraged with my opinion, but anyway: make DDL
>> operations atomic and immediate.
This is the "Oracle way".
> Atomic and immediate means autocommitted or always executed in a
> separate (e.g. system) transaction?
I have strong opinion that system transaction
> 29.04.2014 12:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
>> So, i see autocommit as only possibility, if we choose "Oracle way"
>
> Out of curiosity, why cannot it be done in a separate *non-system*
> transaction? I.e. instead of committing user transaction start we and
> OK, the alternative to record lookups is to store the transaction id in
> index. This would require an index insertion for all indexes defined on
> a table even if the key value didn't change. It would also require a
> corresponding index deletion for each index defined on the table when a
>> 3. Does sorting use pointers to row sort data or are the rows moved in
>> memory during sort?
>
> Rows are moved. This is done this way to avoid duplicated record fetches
> (when sort results are retrieved) causing random I/O. Sorting itself may
> be also highly I/O bound, but it always o
>> AFAIK, transformation of string into key is up to ICU which does not provide
>> a way for
>> backward transformation.
>
> INTL collations are a separate beast, I'm more interested in simpler
> datatypes. If we could mark at least some indices as "decodable", it
> would already be a step forw
> When Jaybird uses distributed transactions, it adds information on the
> Xid (the distributed transaction id) in the call to isc_prepare.
>
> When the transaction is limbo-ed by destroying the connection, another
> connection can recover that by performing a reconnect and then either
> commit
> On Wed, 7 May 2014 09:38:16 +0300, "Vlad Khorsun" wrote:
>>> This leads me to the questions:
>>> 1) When are prepared or rolled back transactions removed from
>>> RDB$TRANSACTIONS? Or are they kept indefinitely?
>>
>> Its never removed. A
> I will see if I can come up with a solution for Firebird 3 without needing
> RDB$TRANSACTIONS to be unprotected, but doesn't - potentially - degenerate
> to iterating over a list of thousands if not millions of transaction
> records when recovering a distributed transaction.
Am i already tol
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 10:53:05 +0300, "Vlad Khorsun" wrote:
>>> I will see if I can come up with a solution for Firebird 3 without
>>> needing
>>> RDB$TRANSACTIONS to be unprotected, but doesn't - potentially -
>>> degenerate
>>> to it
> On 5/2/2014 3:25 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> OK, the alternative to record lookups is to store the transaction id in
>>> index. This would require an index insertion for all indexes defined on
>>> a table even if the key value didn't change. It would als
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 13:46:46 +0300, "Vlad Khorsun" wrote:
>> Surprise : after you got list of tx numbers it can be used to query
>> RDB$TRANSACTIONS for additional info.
>
> But then I could just as well query RDB$TRANSACTIONS directly. I don't
> k
After thinking more on it...
> I could (with FB 2.5 and later) also query with
> RDB$TRANSACTION_DESCRIPTION = X'' (where X'' is the serialized Xid
> I am looking for) although I wonder about its performance implications. On
> the other hand, recovery situations should be rare so it mi
> 10.05.2014 14:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> For blob's we still need that lists, yes
>
> No. In my workcopy I got rid of them for blobs. The trick is not to garbage
> collect
> blobs that are referenced by potentially active versions in undo log.
Explain, pleas
> In short: blob id which going version is referring to can cleaned only if
> it is not
> referred by both previous or next versions. All other versions are irrelevant
> because they
> cannot refer the same blob id. At least in current codebase which creates a
> new copy of
> blob content o
> 10.05.2014 15:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Here you wrong: if blob contents was not changed by update, there will
>> be no new blob.
>
> Yes, and in this case blob cannot be garbage collected because next record
> version
> refers to it. No need to analyze wh
> is your scenario even possible?
>
> wouldn't the engine report an update collision when update version3 was
> attempted?
Since tx2 is read-committed and tx4 is already committed - yes, it is
possible.
Regards,
Vlad
---
> 11.05.2014 0:18, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> It is wrong for "lost update" scenario, which is allowed for
>> read-committed transactions:
>>
>> att1: start tx1, insert version1 (blob1), commit tx1
>>
>> att1: start tx2 (read-committed), re
11.05.2014 16:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 11.05.2014 10:44, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>It is better to write application to test it. And application
>> should be clever enough
>> to be able to put already read blob_id into parameter instead of
>> creating new bl
12.05.2014 17:11, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> Similar logic as described in subj can be found also in expunge(). Record
> is deleted
> from data page first and only then garbage in index is collected. May it be
> another source
> of the problem?
Sure. And this is why
> If a record has uncommitted head version created by active transaction and
> some garbage
> in backversions "tail", can anyone (background GC thread, sweep or parallel
> transaction)
> wipe this garbage from the tail while the transaction is still active?
Yes
> I can't understand wh
> 13.05.2014 13:36, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Yes
>
> How? If I remember your lesson right, garbage in a record is collected only
> if head
> version is marked with transaction number lesser that OAT.
This is a most often case. But, if you look at VIO_chase_record
> 12.05.2014 16:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Sure. And this is why i wrote recently
>>
>> > currently used way of GC ... not 100% safe in highly concurrent
>> environment.
>
> Can this case be fixed by moving call to delete_record() below
> ga
> 13.05.2014 14:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Your code will leave record with broken backversion pointer in case of
>> failure while garbage_collect is running. To avoid this, we need to zero
>> backpointer before
>> garbage_collect. It also have risk to create or
> Firebird::Stack implements LIFO list. Is there a ready to use template for
> FIFO list?
Any Array could by used as FIFO list
Regards,
Vlad
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FRE
> Hello, All.
>
> In Firebird 3.0 following script works differently from 2.5. Is it expected
> side-effect
> of cursor stability?
If you really interested in answer and respect other list members, add
results of your
scripts here to not force others to do what you already did.
Rega
> 10.05.2014 14:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>As for A-B-A
>> updates i see no problem as there will be 3 separate index entries with own
>> tx numbers. Currently we also have 3 index entires for such scenario, btw.
>> Old IB's optimization to not store existing k
> 2.5 result:
>
>> Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 22012
>> arithmetic exception, numeric overflow, or string truncation
>> -Integer divide by zero. The code attempted to divide an integer value by
>> an integer divisor of zero.
>> -At trigger 'DBL_BOOM' line: 7, col: 4
>> After line 17 in file u
> 14.05.2014 18:10, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> I'd said it is really because cursor stability. Looks like top-level
>> update ignores update of record
>> with ID = 2, made by trigger.
>
> Not only this. Two new versions of the record were created instead of on
> I would like to submit an attached patch. It does following things:
I'll look at it but don't expect quick review.
Regards,
Vlad
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly
> Yes, it's a bit mask. See the constants:
Shouldn't it be present in RDB$TYPES, as all other "special" numbers ?
Regards,
Vlad
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run
23.05.2014 12:43, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 23.05.2014 11:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> It's not absolutely required to have bigint column - it's enough to
>> store bit number, which is less than 64.
>
> It makes impossible to use JOIN to retrieve trigger's type via SQL query.
> In this case
>
23.05.2014 13:55, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 23.05.2014 12:48, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> This "useless garbage" is required for self-documenting
>
> Self-documenting of what?
Self-documenting of constants used to encode some values in system
tables in database.
&
> we've started validation of FB built on Linux and we met this situation:
> fb_inet_server hangs instead of returning the error on this query:
>
> insert into s select * from s
It not hungs, it insert rows until disk have space :) What kind of error
do you expect here ?
It is well known i
21.06.2014 0:52, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
> Hello, All!
>
> We have encountered subtle errors and data corruptions when using complex
> triggers/stored procedures in READ COMMITTED
> transactions.
I assume you tell about logical data corruptions, not physical, correct ?
> Most applied program
> AFAIK, concurrent GC in pre-committed transactions without transaction lock
> was unsafe, and created
> permanently broken databases.
> I believe corruption has become especially apparent after commit intended to
> fix CORE-3515. I don't
> know who fixed it, but Red Soft builds include a patc
25.06.2014 12:52, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 25.06.2014 11:46, Roman Simakov wrote:
>> 2014-06-25 12:09 GMT+04:00 Dimitry Sibiryakov :
>>>In this case why to use READ COMMITED transaction at all?..
>>
>> Because opening cursor is not opening transaction. You can have long
>> transaction but no
23.06.2014 20:41, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
> Hello, Dmitry!
>
> On 06/23/2014 04:15 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> 21.06.2014 01:52, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
>>> I attach patch for this functionality to give you an idea of
>>> implementation. It depends on a couple other changes so it doesn't apply
>
01.07.2014 9:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 06/30/14 17:50, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 30.06.2014 15:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> On 06/30/14 17:40, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
It makes issues with plugins harder to detect and diagnose.
>>> Yes, but the reason was also rather strong - ma
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Rotteveel"
To: "For discussion among Firebird Developers"
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] setCursorName in IResultSet rather thanIStatement
> On 23-7-2014 17:59, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Afte
> On 24-7-2014 19:27, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> As far as I understand it, you can't have an IResultSet unless the
>>> result set is open, so setting the cursor name on an IResultSet is not
>>> very logical.
>>
>> What about more than one simul
> However, apparently FB devs don't think it's important to keep it in
> sync with the C++ interface - even if third parties could submit patches
> for that.
This is not true
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing l
11.08.2014 14:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov write:
> I can't remember who did API translation for UIB, but he made a mistake
> using classes
> for declaration.
It was me and it was not a mistake. As you already 'discovered' absence
of not needed QueryInterface in our classes, you should understand
11.08.2014 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 11.08.2014 13:39, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>As you already 'discovered' absence
>> of not needed QueryInterface in our classes, you should understand why it
>> was not a mistake.
>
> It wasn't a mistake
11.08.2014 17:47, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 11.08.2014 18:18, Jim Starkey wrote:
>
>> Since plugins pretty much need to be compiled with the same compiler as the
>> engine
>
> Very questionable requirement. I can easily expect plugins written in
> Delphi.
Agree. More, there is no reason to use s
07.09.2014 17:27, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hi, All.
>
> I see that flag "large scan" is set for blob reading only if reader is
> gbak or size of
> blob is bigger than page cache.
> Doesn't it mean that reading of BLOB that is little smaller than page
> cache will flush
> whole shar
08.09.2014 10:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 08.09.2014 8:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Corresponding number of LRU pages will be evicted, yes.
>
> I cannot imagine an application pattern that read the same BLOB
> repeatedly. Can you?
>
> May be it has sense to
All
Implementation is committed (see CORE-4556).
Regards,
Vlad
PS ODS changed !
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> In a similar vein, if Firebird is still using the venerable Quick Sort
> that a coded more or less straight from Knuth, Volume 2, in 1984, see
> Bentley & McIlroy's "Engineering a Sort Function" for a must faster
> version. If anyone is interested, I've turned it into a C++ template,
> which
26.09.2014 13:27, marius adrian popa :
> I have seen this patch for openjdk
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-September/008685.html
>
> Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
>
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2012/12/05/fast-tcp-loopback-performance-and
06.10.2014 12:48, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
>> 06.10.2014 11:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
>>> Any clue?
>>
>>Add -user SYSDBA
>
> Same error:
> C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_3_0>gsec -add SYSDBA -pw masterkey -user
> SYSDBA
> An error occurred while att
09.10.2014 18:02, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 10/09/14 16:57, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> Hello, All.
>>
>> Is following warning safe?
>>
>>> Generating parse.cpp and dsql.tab.h
>>> warning - the symbol db_ddl_privilege is undefined
>>> C:\Users\SD\MYDOCU~1\firebird\temp\Win32\debug\btyacc
> When we decided not to validate constraints on declaration, our reasoning
> was that computations and database access were expensive and any decent
> application programmer or DBA would always validate constraints before
> declaring them and control access to the constrained items until the
> con
18.11.2014 17:39, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 18/11/2014 09:00, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>>> While it makes sense to have a single official VS projects files based
>>> on a fully free VS, since Microsoft do not learned how to support the
>>> same files in multiple versions, it does not
19.11.2014 11:01, liviuslivius wrote:
> Hi,
> I downloaded today FB 3.0.0.31439 - but i can not connect to it
> And i do not see 3050 listen port with netstat -a
> I try also run firebird.exe -a - without succes - it start but not listen
> 3 days ago there were no problems.
> environment WinXP 32bi
19.11.2014 11:37, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:28:15 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
> wrote:
...
>> Seems, recently introduced support for IPv6 doens't work in XP.
>> It is currently investigated.
>
> Windows XP doesn't have IPv6 installed/enabled
19.11.2014 11:42, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:01:32AM +0100, liviuslivius wrote:
>>
>> I downloaded today FB 3.0.0.31439 - but i can not connect to it
>> And i do not see 3050 listen port with netstat -a
>
> Does setting "RemoteBindAddress 127.0.0.1" in firebird.conf help?
19.11.2014 12:00, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:56 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
> wrote:
>>> Lets play devils advocate:
>>> Do we want to continue to support Windows XP? It is end-of-life, no
>>> longer
>>> receives security updates
19.11.2014 12:30, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:19:36 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
> wrote:
>> Do you really propose us to drop support of OS just because MS did it
>> ???
>
> As I said: playing devils advocate. And yes, that is what I did. If you
> co
19.11.2014 12:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:44:04 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
> wrote:
>> 19.11.2014 12:30, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:19:36 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Do you really prop
19.11.2014 13:52, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Could you please try attached patch? It uses AF_UNSPEC in getaddrinfo()
> hints whenever host string is non-empty and retries getaddrinfo() with
> AF_UNSPEC if AF_INET6 fails for empty host string.
It doesn't look at error codes and tries to guess what
19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
> Windows XP without IPv6 support?
Unfortunately - no. I have no XP machine right now.
> The way I read the manual page it
> should but I would rather make sure.
Agree here.
Regard
19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek пишет:
> Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
> Windows XP without IPv6 support? The way I read the manual page it
> should but I would rather make sure.
On W2K3 without IPv6 i see that getaddrinfo() returns 0 and gai_result
contain
21.11.2014 0:01, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> So I suppose the question is: do we want to introduce a potentially
> risky feature at this stage or would we rather accept the server not
> being able to listen on both IPv4 and IPv6 on two platforms, one of them
> already unsupported now, the other either
21.11.2014 12:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> In current trunk if next page is already full, ppg_min_space got frozen,
> causin
> unnecessary loops in locate_space().
It is not frozen, of course, but not advanced up to the next non-full slot -
here
you are correct.
>
21.11.2014 12:30, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 21.11.2014 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Sorry, but this is bad code. It doesn't check for number of slots on PP
>> and allows
>> unlimited grow of ppg_min_space.
>
> No, ppg_min_space cannot grow more t
21.11.2014 13:11, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:03:12AM +0200, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> 19.11.2014 16:08, Michal Kubecek пишет:
>>
>>> Could you check if first getaddrinfo() call returns EAI_FAMILY on
>>> Windows XP without IPv6 support?
21.11.2014 13:59, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> You are right
Good to know :) Patch is committed, check it please.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate!
21.11.2014 16:45, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:01:09PM +0200, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> 21.11.2014 13:11, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>>>
>>> That's unfortunate... I suppose the easiest way out of this would be
>>> adding something like
&g
25.11.2014 12:28, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> Finally, I'm now be able to build Firebird3 too.
>
> Can my patches be applied upstream?
I going to check and apply them. If someone (Adriano?) already
checked it and\or going to commit - let me know, please.
Regards,
Vlad
---
Hi all.
Recently wire compression was implemented by Alex. It uses well known zlib
library. On Linux zlib could be installed as a standalone package and there
is no problems with its presence nor for Firebird users, nor for those who
going to build Firebird. But on Windows i found no common
28.11.2014 14:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 28/11/2014 09:39, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Recently wire compression was implemented by Alex. It uses well known
>> zlib
>> library. On Linux zlib could be installed as a standalone pa
28.11.2014 13:39, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with
01.12.2014 19:41, Fabiano Kureck - Desenvolvimento SCI wrote:
> How can I enable wire compression? I downloaded Firebird today, and not found
> any documentation about that (That I can found).
Windows build was committed just today, don't hurry ;) Try next snapshot
build
and look for doc\READM
08.12.2014 10:03, Werner wrote:
> I think there is a typo in the section "Execution Modes":
>
> It states:
> Superserver is set up using the configuration SharedDatabase = true and
> SharedCache = true
>
> but I think it should be, as the above contradicts the statement made in the
> "Table 3.1. M
08.12.2014 18:22, Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run following command (passwords changed to my liking) as per
> ReleaseNotes.
> gsec -modify SYSDBA -pw SomethingCryptic -user SYSDBA -password anything
>
> An error occurred while attempting to modify the user record.
> Install incomplete, please read c
09.12.2014 21:58, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> Hi,
> is somwhere FB3 embeded version to download?
There is no more separate embedded version. Just stop (or don't start) server
and use "local" connection string.
Regards,
Vlad
PS re-read the Release Notes, page 6 : "The Providers Archit
10.12.2014 10:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Looks like server can not find/access security database, may be it
> locates firebird root folder incorrectly.
> Is there firebird info in your host's registry?
a) server not used registry to locate root directory for a very long time
b) client not used re
13.12.2014 10:29, Claudio Valderrama C. пишет:
> People, can someone explain how does this work? Probably it's obvious but I
> couldn't find the answer myself.
>
> GarbageCollector::~GarbageCollector()
> {
> SyncLockGuard exGuard(&m_sync, SYNC_EXCLUSIVE,
> "GarbageCollector::~GarbageCollector
16.12.2014 10:27, Rudolf Grauberger wrote:
> I would like to read the table aliases,
After call of isc_dsql_prepare() you'll have XSQLDA structure filled with all
info, including known relation aliases. Read IB6 "API Guide", chapter "Working
with Dynamic SQL". Guide is available here:
16.12.2014 11:13, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:03:39 +0200, Vlad Khorsun
> wrote:
>> 16.12.2014 10:27, Rudolf Grauberger wrote:
>>> I would like to read the table aliases,
>>
>> After call of isc_dsql_prepare() you'll have XSQLDA st
18.12.2014 9:13, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> From d437cb98a45566a51e36cf510434d2f3bd27d302 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexpux mailto:alexey.paw...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:11:09 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixes for commit "make all file descriptors, opened by
> firebird, close on e
18.12.2014 12:01, Alexpux пишет:
>
>> 18 дек. 2014 г., в 11:35, Roman Simakov написал(а):
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>> I'd recommend you to prepare ONE good patch for good goal, send it as
>> file ready for applying, explain why, etc
>> AFAIU your message are generate automatically. But they must be read,
>>
18.12.2014 9:53, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> Some times ago I'm send patch to
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4619
> Will be it applied?
Done.
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT
18.12.2014 10:30, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> From 99c644e7ae0a87573f51d088973e6e43da944e2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexpux mailto:alexey.paw...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:17:46 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Mingw don't support Win98.
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
-
18.12.2014 10:21, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> Mingw also have posix threads library so to resolve conflict we need guard
> using
> posix threads for Windows.
>
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free E
18.12.2014 10:28, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> From abe6a3d9f043550ebd7647422c2eeb89018caa33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexpux mailto:alexey.paw...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:42:19 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] mingw-w64 don't need hack for SecPkgContext_AccessToken
Done.
Regards,
V
22.12.2014 16:02, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> c:\users\sd\my documents\firebird\extern\icu\include\unicode\umachine.h(200):
> error C2146:
> syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'UBool'
>
> ...and so on. Could somebody fix it?..
Should be already fixed.
Regards,
Vlad
---
27.12.2014 12:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> I have a weird problem. In a test I am writing a blob of 24576 bytes.
> This is done in a write (isc_put_segment) of 16384 and 8192 bytes.
>
> If I subsequently query the blob for the length
> (isc_info_blob_total_length), I receive the correct number in th
02.01.2015 17:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 28-12-2014 14:07, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> 27.12.2014 12:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> I have a weird problem. In a test I am writing a blob of 24576 bytes.
>>> This is done in a write (isc_put_segment) of 16384 and 8192 bytes
> AFAIK, client library parse info buffer anyway, so may be it should add
> unflushed info
> to the counter?..
For what ?
Regards,
Vlad
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
spo
15.01.2015 9:29, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 15.01.2015 04:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> I just noted some own checkins not being sent (or received by me) in the
>> mailing list.
>>
>> Do any of you received [60488] and [60495] revisions?
>
> Nope and they're missing in the SF mail arch
05.02.2015 14:36, Geoff Worboys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firebird v2.5.3
>
> I've been studying the source trying to understand the reasons
> behind a particular aspect of EXECUTE STATEMENT with ON EXTERNAL.
>
> Specifically, why are USER PASSWORD and ROLE tied together here?
Why do you think so ? See
18.02.2015 11:18, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
> Hi,
>
> i setup Firebird 2.5 by normal setup install and set in config
> RemoteServicePort = 3050
> and restart it
>
> then i install manually Firebird 3
> and set
> RemoteServicePort = 3051
> and restart it
So, you start two instances of F
18.02.2015 15:46, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
>>>To avoid this message you could start second instance with XNET disabled.
>>> To do it, specify switch -i in command line. Of course, it will disable
>>> local protocol for this instance. It is disabled in any case, btw, but you
>>> can e
301 - 400 of 1273 matches
Mail list logo
