On 19-12-2016 11:39, Andre van Zuydam wrote:
> So bouncing in here on a tangent, I've done this with a couple of
> Source forge projects, simply set Source forge to clone the Github
> project or visa versa. The only reason I would suggest having things on
> Github is for more visibility. Anyway
On 18/12/2016 11:48:34 AM, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Isn't it time to consider migrating the documentation repository from
> SourceForge CVS to GitHub?
>
> SourceForge itself considers CVS deprecated, and having the repository
> on GitHub might increase
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Isn't it time to consider migrating the documentation repository from
> SourceForge CVS to GitHub?
>
> SourceForge itself considers CVS deprecated, and having the repository
> on GitHub might increase visibility and will likely lower the barrier
> for contribution.
No
Isn't it time to consider migrating the documentation repository from
SourceForge CVS to GitHub?
SourceForge itself considers CVS deprecated, and having the repository
on GitHub might increase visibility and will likely lower the barrier
for contribution.
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel