On 16-05-2020 15:17, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
02.05.2020 19:50, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
For FB3, doing it now (or in May in general) is OK to me. For FB4,
please wait until Beta 2 is published.
Mark, you may update the v4 RN files now, if required.
I have made the changes to the rlsnotes40 XML.
02.05.2020 19:50, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
For FB3, doing it now (or in May in general) is OK to me. For FB4,
please wait until Beta 2 is published.
Mark, you may update the v4 RN files now, if required.
Dmitry
___
Firebird-docs mailing list
Firebi
On 02-05-2020 18:50, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
02.05.2020 19:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
1. How useful would it be to migrate old release notes (Firebird 2.5
and earlier)? Without migration, fixing any XML issues in those
documents doesn't seem to be a good investment of my time.
I'd leave them un
02.05.2020 19:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
1. How useful would it be to migrate old release notes (Firebird 2.5 and
earlier)? Without migration, fixing any XML issues in those documents
doesn't seem to be a good investment of my time.
I'd leave them untouched.
2. The release notes apply differe
I have just committed a bulk change fixing a number of XML issues. I
strongly recommend that you update from master as soon as possible to
avoid potential merge conflicts.
I haven't touched the release notes for now, because I wonder about two
things:
1. How useful would it be to migrate old
On 28-04-2020 16:47, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
[conversion DocBook -> asciidoc:]
While working on this, I noticed that some documents apply weird tricks
to offset source listings. For example sometimes or
is wrapped in a so the code-block is offset from
the page margin, or
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
[conversion DocBook -> asciidoc:]
> While working on this, I noticed that some documents apply weird tricks
> to offset source listings. For example sometimes or
> is wrapped in a so the code-block is offset from
> the page margin, or they have a wide whitespace prefix
On 25-04-2020 12:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
While trying out things for conversion to asciidoc, I found several
issues with our current XML which makes some of it invalid docbook (does
not conform to the schema docbook 4.5 schema).
With some testing, I found out that fixing these issue, makes t
While trying out things for conversion to asciidoc, I found several
issues with our current XML which makes some of it invalid docbook (does
not conform to the schema docbook 4.5 schema).
With some testing, I found out that fixing these issue, makes the
quality of the conversion to asciidoc be
