Hello:
> Your new idea is better, but it is only possible because your GDS
> exports quite high-level interface to the rest of the provider. It is
> not (yet?) possible in Jaybird, so I have to use either some other
> tricks or do the refactorings first.
Well, i will be doing a good amount of
Hello:
> Shouldn't these two implementations coexist? I mean, when connection is =
> creating, - provider should check which server version it connecting to, =
> and then decide which implementation to use.
If we can put the server identification outside the GDS implementation,
yes ( right now i
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
> Hello:
>
> We are going to need to implement the version 11 of the Firebird
> Protocol and review the buffer handling code to make better checks on
> buffer lengths and server resposnses.
> For the new GDS implementation, my first thought is that we can make all
Nazri M wrote:
> greetings,
>
> Previously I was using Firebird .net provider 1.7 in my visual studio
> 2005 programs and all was well.
> However when I installed the FireBird Client 2.0 and use it's
> fbdataadapter, a dataset and a datagridview with visual studio 2005 I
> get the following
>> I ask, because I think that would be to our (.Net and Java drivers) benefit
>> to
>> document these changes somehow. Do you think it is worth the effort? Is
>> it feasible at all?
>
> Sure. I think i should update the protocol documentation i have for the
> actual protocol implementation of
greetings,
Previously I was using Firebird .net provider 1.7 in my visual studio 2005
programs and all was well.
However when I installed the FireBird Client 2.0 and use it's fbdataadapter,
a dataset and a datagridview with visual studio 2005 I get the following error ;
"An unhandled
Hello:
> These two examples that you posted, where did you get them?
I have coded them in order to test the batching feature XD and both are
working :)
> I ask, because I think that would be to our (.Net and Java drivers) benefit
> to
> document these changes somehow. Do you think it is wor
Hello,
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez said the following on 01.05.2007 15:36:
> For the new GDS implementation, my first thought is that we can make all
> the public methods on the current GDS implementation virtual, and
> override ( and rewrite ) them in the new GDS implementation
Shouldn't these two
Carlos,
> We are going to need to implement the version 11 of the Firebird
> Protocol and review the buffer handling code to make better checks on
> buffer lengths and server resposnses.
>
> Now the Firebird server supports batching of messages ( not available
> for all of them ), so we can se
Hello:
We are going to need to implement the version 11 of the Firebird
Protocol and review the buffer handling code to make better checks on
buffer lengths and server resposnses.
Now the Firebird server supports batching of messages ( not available
for all of them ), so we can send several me
10 matches
Mail list logo
