Hello:
> This I've pathced in my local tree too. I'll try to run some test with
> your complete patch ('cause my isn't done :P) and let see, what will
> Carlos say. :)
If all nunit tests are running fine with the patch we can apply the
patch in 2.5 sources.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
On 10/22/07, Dean Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other than that, the only other thing I had to change was the
> StatusVector stuff in IDbClient so that it's an IntPtr instead of an int.
This I've pathced in my local tree too. I'll try to run some test with
your complete patch ('cause my isn
Are we talking about server or provider? Look like you're mixing this together.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
harpal singh wrote:
> hello all,
> we have migrate from ms-sql to firebird2.0(super server)
> for .net.but it is very slower than ms-sql.
> plz help me
What, specifically, is slower? I'd like to see:
1. The statement used to create the relevant tables & indexes (both fr
hello all,
we have migrate from ms-sql to firebird2.0(super server) for
.net.but it is very slower than ms-sql.
plz help me
harpal
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping throu
Hi everyone,
So I was playing around with the data provider and the 64-bit version of
2.1 beta 2 embedded this weekend, and I managed to get it to work.
I've got a .zip containing my changes (as applied to the provider
2.5.0-alpha1) here:
http://codeka.com/tmp/firebird.net-2.5.0-alpha1-64bit-p
