Convite pessoal de Raimundo Morais
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
Hello:
What about the backport, Carlos? Isn't done yet?
>
It isn't done, and i will be not able to do it until holydays ends.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
Hello:
Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are
> having the same problems with the "server" (not the
>
embedded one).
>
Well no, it maybe a problem on it, but we may try to check where is the
problem ( the 2.0+ has performance changes on other areas as well, b
Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are having
the same problems with the "server" (not the embedded one).
Our intention is to continue using Firebird as our primary target database, so
we'll really like to outperform other SCM systems using Fb as we do using SQL
What about the backport, Carlos? Isn't done yet?
Hello:
Recently I have reported bug with remote events
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-140.
The bug is fixed, but where can I get Firebird .NET Provider version
including this bugfix? As I see, the bugfix will only be
Hello:
We have to continue using .NET 1.1 that's why we didn't move to a newer
> provider.
>
Ok, it maybe a provider problem, in version 2.0+ there are several changes
in the embedded server support some of them to solver performance problems (
that if i remember well they are not applied to 1.7
Hi Carlos,
I'll try to run again the test profiling the Firebird provider.
We're using 2.0 embedded, but same results with 2.0 (in fact the lastest 2
available) server.
We're running with both .NET 1.1 and Mono 1.x profile.
We're still using the "old" 1.7.1 provider with the "charset" fix (o
Hi there,
Plastic is www.plasticscm.com.
I didn't try with isql, I would need to run several queries in parallel to
actually know whether the problem is the provider or not. What I wanted to
know is whether you've profiled it under concurrent access or not.
Locking should be the most likely o
