On 1/11/08, Martin Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone suggest what logical test I should use on this?
Checking error code is the best way. You can also distinguish what
exactly happend.
> Also are the error codes defined anywhere in the .net provider source?
Error codes and messages for
I'm currently trying to write a transaction handler which will retry the
transaction if there has been a conflict with another transaction...
however... I'm failing to find any solid documentation on how to detect this
state. The FbException I get when an update conflict occurs contains:
FbExcepti
Hi Jiri,
in addition to the GetSchema methods, I started to write a documentation
like http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms254969(VS.80).aspx. I
found out that some bool values are returned as bool, others as short,
others as integer. Is it useful to change the related fields in the
ret
On 1/11/08, VS-Polis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have more important things to do, you can wait until I set a
> corrected version of the SELECT command in Schema\FbColumns.cs into
> DNET-151.
No problem, it's just a simple case statement.
I hope DNET-151 and 152 will be resolved during we
On 1/11/08, Helen Borrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >OK, now I see. I missed, that the column will be evaluated only for
> >column definition without domain.
>
> Incorrect. All column definitions have a domain, including those that are
> defined independently of a user-defined domain. All of t
>On 1/11/08, André Knappstein, Controlling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Once you remove the "NOT NULL" from the domain, this column would
>> still remain "not nullable".
You cannot remove the NOT NULL constraint.
At 09:33 PM 11/01/2008, Jiri wrote:
>OK, now I see. I missed, that the column wi
Hi,
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> "is_nullable" means, that column accepts NULL values. So it should be
> (keep eyes on me Helen :)):
> 1. domain has "NOT NULL" clause (no matter what's on column
> definition) > is_nullable = false
> 2. column has "NOT NULL" clause > is_nullable = false
> 3. Othervise is_
On 1/11/08, André Knappstein, Controlling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once you remove the "NOT NULL" from the domain, this column would
> still remain "not nullable".
OK, now I see. I missed, that the column will be evaluated only for
column definition without domain.
PS: I haven't looked to the
On 1/11/08, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> i found one little mistake in GetSchemaCommandText() function of
> FbDataReader (i downloaded source and binary just few minutes ago)
> so, we have following sql statement
Sorry man, damn typo (during formating, rewriting to inner joins
Hello Jiri,
>> Maybe what you want and need is a (new?) property "NOT_NULL_SET" which
>> could result to false for the column while "is_nullable" still _CAN_
>> return false because of the underlying domain.
JC> Isn't this just negation of is_nullable? BTW in schema table are some
JC> well-known
Hi Jiri,
i found one little mistake in GetSchemaCommandText() function of
FbDataReader (i downloaded source and binary just few minutes ago)
so, we have following sql statement
SELECT
fld.rdb$computed_blr AS computed_blr,
fld.rdb$compu
On 1/11/08, André Knappstein, Controlling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at a column which is not nullable because you set "NOT NULL"
> to the column, you would EXPECT the property "is_nullable" to be
> true, where "true" is represented by the numeric value 1.
> I would NOT, because literally
André Knappstein wrote:
> I am a bit worried, in any case, that you would expect different
> results for the 2 cases, because in both cases the column literally
> "is not nullable".
>
> Maybe what you want and need is a (new?) property "NOT_NULL_SET" which
> could result to false for the column wh
Jürgen,
reading this I am quite glad that I have not needed this property in
.net provider so far, because I admit it would exceed my comprehension
of FB internals.
Just in case I need it in future, I would like to get an additional
clarification:
Looking at a column which is not nullable becau
14 matches
Mail list logo
