Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Memory leak in ASP.NET pages showing

2008-09-25 Thread Mercea Paul
> Sorry about that. On XP, the process is named "aspnet_wp.exe" and on > Windows Server 2003 it is "w3wp.exe". Basically it is the task > handling the > ASP.NET. However, it only happens when I access the firebird database. > [PM] Can you try to open your connection before execution and clos

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Memory leak in ASP.NET pages showing

2008-09-25 Thread Carlos
Hello: Sorry about that. On XP, the process is named "aspnet_wp.exe" and on > Windows Server 2003 it is "w3wp.exe". Basically it is the task handling > the > ASP.NET. However, it only happens when I access the firebird database. Are you calling Dispose on all provider instances if classes cla

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Memory leak in ASP.NET pages showing

2008-09-25 Thread Mark
Sorry about that. On XP, the process is named "aspnet_wp.exe" and on Windows Server 2003 it is "w3wp.exe". Basically it is the task handling the ASP.NET. However, it only happens when I access the firebird database. Thanks, Mark ""Mercea Paul"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:!&!

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird embedded(ver 2.1) 64 bit support with DotNetFirebird client

2008-09-25 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Madhu Sasidhar, MD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jiri > There are some situations where protocol 11 would make a significant > difference to performance. Do you know when you might have the changes in > place. Will be happy to test and may have some numbers to report