Is it enough to use FB 2.5 only for model generation? Can I use FB 2.1
in productive program version?
Jiri Cincura schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 16:03, Martin Jan Turek wrote:
Do you know something about this behaviour?
Use FB 2.5 for model generation.
--
Mit freundlichen Gr
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 16:03, Martin Jan Turek wrote:
> Do you know something about this behaviour?
Use FB 2.5 for model generation.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
---
Hello!
I've got following problem with the entity framwork and VS 2008:
I've tried to create an entity framework with a firebird database. I
installed the new Firebird Client version and the FirebirdDDEXProvider
in VS 2008 and it works. But now I tried to create a ADO.NET Entity
Framework. I've
Hello Julio,
No problem. The UpdateChanges() method tells the dataset that mods that been
done therefore the update method had nothing to do.
Mike
> Thanks Mike, that was the trick :)
>
> Julio
>
> --
>
> Let Crystal
Thanks Mike, that was the trick :)
Julio
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, co
Hello Julio,
Don't do AcceptChanges(). Just update the row and then do the .Update().
HTH
Mike
> Hi,
>
> Hope that someone can help me, I am a newbie on .NET, and I'm involved
> now developing an asp.net application with firebird. So, after reading
> some tutorials, I started with the Dataset
