And there's another one. What about connection pooling? :)
The pool is currently based on connection string. So if you open
connection with .Open(suppressTrigger: true) and later call
.Open(suppressTriggers: false) you'll get wrong behavior. I can extend
the pool to take into account this "special
Do you have C++ runtime on that machine? The msvc.dlls?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
mon
Hi Guys,
I'm using Firebird.Data.FirebirdClient.dll version 2.6.5.0 and fbembed.dll
version 2.5.1.26351 with a .NET v4.0 c# application. It works fine on my
development machine but when I install on a target Windows XP box I get an
error "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL 'C:\Prog
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jiri Cincura wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Gerdus van Zyl
> wrote:
>> I would prefer it on the FbConnection.Open method.
>> It would then be like transaction options and
>> Connection.BeginTransaction. The connection string thus remains
>> uncomplicat
One more vote for the .Open method. I think it`s quite firebird-specific
and therefore has no place in the connection string.
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Mercea Paul
> wrote:
>> As i remember well there is a option on restore proces to start without
>> activating database triggers.
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Gerdus van Zyl wrote:
> I would prefer it on the FbConnection.Open method.
> It would then be like transaction options and
> Connection.BeginTransaction. The connection string thus remains
> uncomplicated.
OTOH the default (generic) isolation level can be specifie
