> It kind of breaks the notion of altering the table/column with one
command. It's a bit of magic with system tables and people might get
confused or break it by chaning the script.
The update script should not be changed by users generated by migration. Or
maybe I don't know something?
> MSSQL has
> 1. What problem in Execute block?
It kind of breaks the notion of altering the table/column with one command.
It's a bit of magic with system tables and people might get confused or break
it by chaning the script.
> 2. My opinion for "Identity" is to copy MSSQL behavior. Create generator for
Can you provide it on github, so I can patch my copy of FB library to use
in our project?
1. What problem in Execute block?
2. My opinion for "Identity" is to copy MSSQL behavior. Create generator
for each primary key + trigger before insert.
2014-11-08 14:38 GMT+02:00 Jiří Činčura :
> Great. H
Great. Here's http://ge.tt/2Cx9f142?c early implementation. There are two
issues which I'm not sure how to do (see below). Rest should work. But there
might be some missing space etc. in generated SQL or I might wrote it in
different engine's dialect. That's what I'm mostly looking for for this
