> I'd like to do this. But when I register it in provider services, it does
> not work. Not sure why.
Ahh. Finally found it. IdbInterceptors are not supported for registration in
DbProviderServices. So we're probably left with only DbInterception.Add. I did
some research and looks it should work
> One more question, how can I register custom implementation of
> IFbMigrationSqlGeneratorBehavior?
Register MigrationSqlGenerator with FbMigrationSqlGenerator and pass the
implementation to ctor. Something like:
AddDependencyResolver(new
SingletonDependencyResolver>(() => new
FbMigrationSqlGe
> or maybe via AddDependencyResolver(new
> SingletonDependencyResolver()) as suggested in
> documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-
> ru/library/system.data.entity.dbconfiguration.addinterceptor(v=vs.113).asp
> x),
I'd like to do this. But when I register it in provider services, it does not
One more question, how can I register custom implementation of
IFbMigrationSqlGeneratorBehavior?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Геннадий Забула wrote:
> According to this:
> http://entityframework.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Interception
> As I understand DbConfiguration.AddInterceptor is for
According to this:
http://entityframework.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Interception
As I understand DbConfiguration.AddInterceptor is for context instance
interceptions.
And DbInterceptors.AddInterceptor is for global-wide interceptions.
I suggest moving registration MigrationsTransactionsIntercepto
Yeah, but it’s different path. The InternalConfiguration class might or might
not like that (now or in the future). It’s problem waiting to happen.
And please stop sending HTML emails.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
> That’s not the same as what AddInterceptor call does.
As far as I see in the debugger, MigrationsTransactionsInterceptor is
called successfully and failed tests are going further. I've added just one
fix to filter just Firebird connections:
public void BeginningTransaction(DbConnection connection
The name for index is created by EF if the explicit value is not provided.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and d
That’s not the same as what AddInterceptor call does.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
From: Геннадий Забула [mailto:zabulu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:36 AM
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] EF Mig
One more thing about naming indexes conventions. Indexes namespace is
global. So if you have several same fields in different tables, you'll have
the same name index for both. Good example in three entities with N:M
relations:
Entity1: eid, name
Entity2: eid, name
Entity3: eid, name
Entity1Entity3:
And looks like it works:
public FbProviderServices()
{
#if (EF_6)
AddDependencyResolver(new
SingletonDependencyResolver(new
FbConnectionFactory()));
AddDependencyResolver(new
SingletonDependencyResolver>(() => new
FbMigrationSqlGenerator(), ProviderInvariantName));
System.Data.Entity.Infrastructur
I've found out that there is the static class:
System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.Interception.DbInterception, which adds
IDbInterceptor,
2014-12-30 11:23 GMT+02:00 Jiří Činčura :
> > I'm using the same Context for both MSSQL and Firebird, how deriving
> from FbDbConfiguration can affect MSSQL cod
> I'm using the same Context for both MSSQL and Firebird, how deriving from
> FbDbConfiguration can affect MSSQL code path? Can we override this somehow
> just in Firebird provider?
You can use the same context. It's just configuration. I'm waiting for reply
from EF guys to see what other optio
> Your configuration for context needs to derive from FbDbConfiguration. So
far there's no better solution. The migrations are run in serializable
transaction and you need to insert into __MigrationHistory right after
creation. Disaster.
I'm using the same Context for both MSSQL and Firebird, how
More info at:
http://blog.cincura.net/233492-ado-net-provider-4-6-0-0-for-firebird-is-ready/ .
Enjoy.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Websi
Your configuration for context needs to derive from FbDbConfiguration. So far
there's no better solution. The migrations are run in serializable transaction
and you need to insert into __MigrationHistory right after creation. Disaster.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
From: Генна
> 1. Generator ID. One for all is bad options for me. I'll reimplement it to
> have one for table.
That's why it's open.
> 2. Couple of errors in creating Constraints or Indexes:
"unsuccessful metadata update
Name longer than database column size"
Constraint names are longer than it can be in sy
17 matches
Mail list logo
