Well thank you for sugestions.
After some thinking we'll use soultion with wrapper classes.
Thank for your time
Lukáš Vykydal
Dne 1/16/2015 v 11:24 AM Jiří Činčura napsal(a):
> Well, you can do simple:
> StartTiming();
> Execute();
> LogElapsed();
>
> Of if you want to do more fancy solution you
On 2015.01.16 12:02 PM, Lukáš Vykydal wrote:
> We d'like to monitor performance (time to execute) for every statement.
>
> We have a lot of code which use only base ADO.NET access to database.
> With this change we can find "performance killers" in this code more
> easly including parameters and pl
Well, you can do simple:
StartTiming();
Execute();
LogElapsed();
Of if you want to do more fancy solution you should wrap all the FbXxx classes
into wrappers. That's how other layers work (profilers, O/Rs, ...).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
> -Original Message-
> From
We d'like to monitor performance (time to execute) for every statement.
We have a lot of code which use only base ADO.NET access to database.
With this change we can find "performance killers" in this code more
easly including parameters and plan.
That is the main reason for this request.
Luk
What are you trying to do that is not possible without it?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of servi
Hi all,
can we make "frontend" classes for FbNetProvider (primarly
FbConnecton, FbTransaction, FbCommand) not sealed ??
This will be handy for performance monitoring of applications
(especially Execute* functions in FBCommand).
What do you think ?
I you'll like this this changes, i can prepa
