Guid is opaque value. Interpretation in string is just a visual representation.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering
Of course, but the same interpretation regardless of the system.
System.Guid.ToString is not the same as select uuid_to_char (guid).
in an application that mixes char(16) character set octets and varchar(36) is
not possible currently, why?
Norbert Saint Georges
TetraSys Oy
Bergantie
in an application that mixes char(16) character set octets and varchar(36)
is not possible currently, why?
It's simple. Don't do it. You're mixing binary data with string. Depending on
LE or BE system you might get different result.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
Hello
I have a problem with GUIDs below, describe
CREATE TABLE RM_CUSTOMERS_LINK_GUID (
GUIDCHAR(16) CHARACTER SET OCTETS,
GUID36 VARCHAR(36),
UUIDCOMPUTED BY (uuid_to_char(guid))
);
method MainForm.insert_RM_CUSTOMERS_LINK_GUID( GUID: System.Guid; GUID36:
And what’s not clear?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Why is the translation of the guid with uuid_to_char(guid) (field UUID) NOT the
same as guid.tostring (field guid36)
var UserGuid : System.Guid := System.Guid.NewGuid;
insert_RM_CUSTOMERS_LINK_GUID(UserGuid,UserGuid.ToString);
GUID
GUID36
UUID
ê„þET +Mƒ $T•— È
