> I may have missed the point or I'm not aware of all the details here but
> trying to use a GUID in its string representation is a failure by itself.
Thank you!
> Is there a case where this is needed because doing it right (using a Guid
> as its type and not as string) and use parameters isn't
> Too much effort?
Correct.
Currently MS's story is only EF6 and EFCore so I don't want to waste too
much of my free time on anything extra. Considering the move to EF6 from
EF5 is not that difficult I don't see much reasons to keep it (and there
has been plenty of time to do it). And of course
I may have missed the point or I'm not aware of all the details here but trying
to use a GUID in its string representation is a failure by itself.
I see no benefit in making something work that isn't advisable in the first
place. Like trying to move a datetime as string to the db and hoping it
Too much effort?
On 10 January 2017 at 19:21, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> Have you considered supporting two separate libraries? In two separate
>> branches/nuget and so on?
>
> Not really.
>
> --
> Mgr. Jiří Činčura
> Independent IT Specialist
>
>
We had encountered this one in our migration to .net provider, it
caused us much pain, because divergence with other SQL providers.
I'd vote for changing this and declaring it as breaking change. With
supplied fixes for existing code, of course.
On 10 January 2017 at 16:20, Jiří Činčura
> Have you considered supporting two separate libraries? In two separate
> branches/nuget and so on?
Not really.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Have you considered supporting two separate libraries? In two separate
branches/nuget and so on?
On 9 January 2017 at 16:55, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> anybody still using EF5 (or even EF4)? Or is everybody on EF6...
> Thinking about slimming the
Hi *,
we have this ticket DNET-509 in tracker. Although I agree the change
would be nice, it's also a breaking change as huge as it can get. What's
your take on it? Or do you see clean way out?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
> I think I am running out of memory which leads to the connection being
> terminated.
> In such a case the Exception should be Out of Memory.
> Possibly the Exception caught is incorrect.
> Can this be confirmed please.
Yes it can.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
Hello Jiri,
is it neccessary or recommended to dispose a FbRemoteEvent with this new
release? (I assume it should be disposed)
Number of events: Is this the number the program can listen to or something
different?
Thanks
Niko
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jiří Činčura
Hi *,
The events code was not much reliable and I recently got time to work on
it to improve it. So in foreseeable future the changes from `events`
branch will be merged and new version will be released. Given it's
breaking changes it's going to be very very likely new major version.
Here's a
11 matches
Mail list logo