oct. 2013 à 09:47, Jiri Cincura a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Pierre Arnaud
>> wrote:
>> It's an FbException wrapping an IscException with the following message:
>>
>> I/O error during "CreateFile (open)" operation for file
&g
> > Calling FbBackup.Execute throws the exception because of the sharing
> > violation.
>
> What's the message exactly?
It's an FbException wrapping an IscException with the following message:
I/O error during "CreateFile (open)" operation for file
"C:\PROGRAMDATA\FOO\BAR.FIREBIRD"
Error w
> You mean FbBackup?
Ah, yes, sorry. The interface IDbServiceTools.Backup is not part of
the .NET Provider, but part of one of our DB layers.
We are calling FbBackup.Execute with just one path in BackupFiles, a
ConnectionString which specifies the Embedded server type and as the
Options, just 'Ig
Hello,
We had been using successfully IDbServiceTools.Backup with the Embedded
Firebird DLL. For some time now, and with no apparent reason (i.e. we
cannot figure out what changed in our source control tracking system),
the backup fails with a sharing violation, when the backup tries to
open the d
Hi Jiri,
We have gone the "try to connect to database" route. Trying to create
the database requires that you also cleanup afterwards in order not to
leave an empty database lying around; and what if you can't delete it?
Or what if some other process tries to do the same thing at the same
time?
O
It's always nice being able to clean up code :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Cincura [mailto:disk...@cincura.net]
Sent: mercredi 1 août 2012 14:25
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Dropping (pure) .NET 2.0 support
As we don
I wanted to know if there is some hidden API in the Firebird .NET provider
which would allow me to backup a remote database to a local file (I mean
local on the client machine), just like what can be achieved with GBAK :
http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq62/
Pierre
-
07, 2010 3:41 PM
> To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Transaction configuration with the
> ADO.NET Data provider for Firebird
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 14:45, Pierre Arnaud wrote:
> > Would you consider adding
Environment: Any
Reporter: Pierre Arnaud
Assignee: Jiri Cincura
Allow the provider to request table locking when creating a transaction.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators
Hello Jiri,
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:36, Marc Bettex wrote:
> > new FbTransactionOptions()
> > {
> > TransactionBehavior = FbTransactionBehavior.Concurrency |
> > FbTransactionBehavior.Wait | FbTransactionBehavior.LockWrite |
> > FbTransactionBehavior.Protected
> > };
>
> You can't spe
t: Sunday, June 13, 2010 5:49 PM
> To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbDataAdapter, commands and
> transactions
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 13:55, Pierre Arnaud
> wrote:
> > No, I do not call SqlCommandBuilder.G
ET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbDataAdapter, commands and
> transactions
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 22:39, Pierre Arnaud wrote:
> > Because adapter.UpdateCommand stays null for the whole execution of
> > my program!
>
> Are you calling GetUp
> > Is there some official means of getting the adapter to use the new
> > transaction when it refreshes its update command, other than my
> > current hack ?
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but why not to set
> adapter.UpdateCommand's transaction?
Because adapter.UpdateCommand stays null for the
Hello Jiří,
I have been struggling with FbDataAdapter for years now (it goes back to
the days when Carlos was in charge), and I had finally given up and used
a hack to fix my problem; I've come across it again and I'd like to know
if there is a proper way to solve it.
Here is what I do:
- I crea
Hello Jiri,
Thank you for your quick reply.
> What profiling technique are you using? Instrumentation? Sampling? ...
Sampling, as this is the less intrusive of the performance tools. There
is only a slight "wall clock" difference between a run with and without
the performance monitoring.
> > -
Hello Jiri et al,
I am working on a large project which we migrated from .NET 2 to .NET 4
a few weeks ago. Up to this morning, I was still linking against the
2.5.0 build of FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient (built for .NET 2.0).
After updating to 2.5.2, compiled on VS 2010 for .NET 4.0, I ran our
oviders
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbTransactionOptions.Read / Write
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Pierre Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Well, I am lost here. I am referring to following SVN file :
> >
> >
> <https://firebird.sv
> -Original Message-
> From: Jiri Cincura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:57 AM
> To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] How to build from SVN sources
[...]
> I'm building using VS2008 and/or msbui
Hi Jiri,
> > I've just discovered that I can no longer specify an
> > FbTransactionOptions.Read or FbTransactionOptions.Write flag when I
> > call FbTransaction.BeginTransaction with .NET Provider 2.5.
>
> You mean Alpha 2? It's same as 2.1. You will just specify
> FbTransactionOptions.Foo | FbTr
Hello Jiri,
I've been away for over a year from the Firebird .NET scene and now I'd
like to build the latest version of the source tree.
I've checked out the full "trunk" of NETProvider and I naively tried to
just do a nant build in the /build/win32/ado.net/ folder. I got compile
errors caused by
Hi,
I've just discovered that I can no longer specify an
FbTransactionOptions.Read or FbTransactionOptions.Write flag when I
call FbTransaction.BeginTransaction with .NET Provider 2.5.
What is the official means of stating that a transaction will not
modify anything and should be "read only" ?
A
Hello Carlos,
How sad that you leave us alone in the dark ;-) but nevertheless, I
hope you'll enjoy your spare time and find other exciting things to
do, which have nothing in common with keyboards and mice.
Is there any official maintainer who is in charge of collecting bug
fixes and putting up
On Sunday, November 19, 2006 1:27 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>> Disabling the constraint checking on the DataSet loads a column
>> which now has 128 characters in length, not 32 ! The first 32 chars
>> are correct and then I see 96 spaces.
>
> Huummm
Hello Carlos,
I've been using the UNICODE_FSS character set specification in my
connection string successfully when accessing fixed length CHAR(n)
columns defined as UTF8.
I have a column with CHAR(32) CHARACTER SET UTF8 specified and when
I fill a DataSet through a DataAdapter, I get back my 32
On Friday, November 03, 2006 7:16 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Pierre Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (6) I create a transaction, associate it with my original SELECT
>command, then I call Update on the adapter. However, at this
>point, the InsertCommand already exists; it is
Hello Carlos,
Sorry to bother you again. I've spent the whole day trying to pin down
a problem I had never experienced with the 1.7 provider and that I have
now with the latest 2.1 from CVS.
I cannot provide you with a demo code for now, as it is very difficult
to get to the point where the probl
With the 1.7 version of FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.dll, I could generate
a FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.xml file which helped Visual Studio in pro-
viding better Intellisense support.
I have not been able to generate the XML file for the 2.0 provider. Has
anybody some hints as to how I should proceed?
command.Transaction = null;
transaction.Commit ();
dataSet.Tables[0].Rows.Add (300, "Pierre", "Arnaud",
System.DBNull.Value, System.DateTime.Now, 622, "Eng", 5, "Switzerland", 0.0, "Arnaud, Pierre"
Here is an update on the previously described bug.
If I edit the SelectCommmand of the DataApter in the FbCommandBuilder
RowUpdatingHandler to remove the "WHERE (0 = 1)" condition, the code
no longer crashes. This should really narrow down the problem :-)
If you find a fix, how can I get the upda
Hello Carlos,
It has been quite some time since I did not update my code with respect
to Firebird and the FirebirdClient library.
I have downloaded and compiled FirebirdClient ADO.NET 2.0 provider for
.NET 2.0. It is the final 2.0 version. And I am running a RC5 Firebird
server on my 2003 server.
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:52 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Alexander Gräf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, yes, the database seems to need support for two-phase
commits
If Ann or Helen would read that! Of course, Firebird *does* support
two-phase/limbo transaction. However, don't ask me how to utilize
On Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:41 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello:
Thank you for this wonderfully concise answer ;-)
hehehe :)
Any plans for doing it in some not too distant future ?
In first place no, i should give a review to that but in first place
t
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:20 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
Hello:
I wonder what the relationship between the Firebird .NET provider and
System.Transactions is. I've searched the archives of the list and
not found any mention of TransactionScope.
Did you already implemen
Hello Carlos,
I wonder what the relationship between the Firebird .NET provider and
System.Transactions is. I've searched the archives of the list and not
found any mention of TransactionScope.
Did you already implement support for these system transactions ?
Pierre
-
34 matches
Mail list logo
