> > It's not? Even if you keep a 1-1 relationship between threads and
> > connections (i.e. use a separate connection per thread)?
>
> If you have separate connections for each thread, why bother about
> thread safety? Thread safe is about using one connection in multiple
> threads.
Yeah, sorry,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 00:15, Dean Harding wrote:
> It's not? Even if you keep a 1-1 relationship between threads and
> connections (i.e. use a separate connection per thread)?
If you have separate connections for each thread, why bother about
thread safety? Thread safe is about using one connec
Having multiple connections was a nice idea ... until latency started
messing with the data :) I had cases of commited transactions which are
not seen by the secondary connection (despite semaphore/lock
synchornization ...), which is why I switched to the single connection
method ...
Mon,
> > FbClient is threadsafe, no worries there.
>
> FirebirdClient isn't thread safe.
It's not? Even if you keep a 1-1 relationship between threads and
connections (i.e. use a separate connection per thread)?
Dean.
--
_
2009/3/29 Zvjezdan Tomicevic :
> FbClient is threadsafe, no worries there.
FirebirdClient isn't thread safe.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
I`m currently using a slightly modified version of the 2.1 provider, which
raises an exception when I try to begin multiple transactions (which is
the current source of most of my issues).
Is the 2.5 beta capable of concurent transactions? Is it stable enough for
basic functionality (select,
You can execute lightweigth dumb query against DB in separate thread for
connection checking purposes.
FbClient is threadsafe, no worries there.
Executing read only query unrelated to user data shold not conflict with
your bussiness at all.
2009/3/29 Ivan Arabadzhiev
> I am currently developing
I am currently developing an application which is supposed to silently
ignore lack of database connectivity and continue working transparantly to
the end user. There is indication on the GUI about the state of the
connection, but I noticed it doesn`t change until an operation is
attempted,
I am currently developing an application which is supposed to silently
ignore lack of database connectivity and continue working transparantly to
the end user. There is indication on the GUI about the state of the
connection, but I noticed it doesn`t change until an operation is
attempted, so I do
