On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Jiri Cincura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK the FbServerProperties class should work. The FbServerConfig
> class isn't working now, 'cause it's not implemented on server side.
Thanks, Jiri.
--
Douglas Tosi
www.sinatica.com
-
AFAIK the FbServerProperties class should work. The FbServerConfig
class isn't working now, 'cause it's not implemented on server side.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Jiri Cincura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Douglas Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Where do I find the ISCCFG_ codes in the Firebird source?
>
> http://firebird.cvs.sourceforge.net/firebird/firebird2/src/
I actually had no clue w
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Douglas Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please correct me.
> I would have to:
> - add new ISCCFG_* codes to IscCodes.cs
> - add new fields to FbServerConfig class.
> - extend ParseServerConfig() in FbService.cs to read the new fields.
Yes, probably. I have not i
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Jiri Cincura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Douglas Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Current struct FbServerConfig seems outdated. It does not reflect all
>> the fields in firebird.conf from Firebird 2.1.
>> Is it a limitation in the
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Douglas Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current struct FbServerConfig seems outdated. It does not reflect all
> the fields in firebird.conf from Firebird 2.1.
> Is it a limitation in the .net provider or in the services API?
> If it's in the .net provider, how can
Hello!
Current struct FbServerConfig seems outdated. It does not reflect all
the fields in firebird.conf from Firebird 2.1.
Is it a limitation in the .net provider or in the services API?
If it's in the .net provider, how can I help? Can you give some
pointer on which files to look at?
Thanks,
[]
