Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Jiri Cincura
On 10/19/07, Viatcheslav Valerievitch Vassiliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After setting size of second parameter it throws null reference exception: > > cmd.Parameters.Add("@str_val", FbDbType.VarChar, 20); > > Provider seems to need some changes to be used with x64, my first test was > very ini

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Viatcheslav Valerievitch Vassiliev
7 8:02 AM Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64 > Viatcheslav Valerievitch Vassiliev wrote: >> First tests of ADO.Net on Firebird 2.1 beta 2 for Win64 are successfull. >> C# application runs in 64bit mode and executes simple actions >> with embedded Firebird. (I

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Jiri Cincura
On 10/19/07, Dean Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's not what I'm seeing actually. I'm getting memory corruption > errors when running with the 64-bit fbembed.dll -- 32-bit works fine. > I've tried it with three different version of the provider: 2.0.1, 2.1 > RC2 and 2.5 Alpha 1. I'm runn

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Dean Harding
Carlos wrote: > We well need to review if the actual embedded GDS implementation uses > the correct data types to work against the 64 bit embedded server ( i > will doubt it a lot but ... ) > > If not, there will be the need of a new GDS for the 64 bit embedded server. Heh, I just replied to your

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Dean Harding
Carlos wrote: >> I don't know if the problem is specific to the .NET data provider, or if >> it's some bug in fbembed.dll itself, though... > > I maybe wrong but i think the embedded server for 64 bits will need a > new GDS implementation. Well, I was just browsing through the code, and I can see

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Carlos
Hello: > It was only released in the last couple of days as part of 2.1 beta 2. > > http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=files&id=fb210_beta02 Ok, so i was missing something at all XD We well need to review if the actual embedded GDS implementation uses the correct data types to work against

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Dean Harding
Carlos wrote: > Where do you have downloaded the 64-bit version of the embedded server ?? > > I ask because i'm seeing the sourceforge downloads and the embedded > server is there only for 32 bit platforms ( unless i'm missing > something ) It was only released in the last couple of days as part

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Carlos
Hello: > That's not what I'm seeing actually. I'm getting memory corruption > errors when running with the 64-bit fbembed.dll -- 32-bit works fine. > I've tried it with three different version of the provider: 2.0.1, 2.1 > RC2 and 2.5 Alpha 1. Where do you have downloaded the 64-bit version of th

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-19 Thread Carlos
Hello: > I don't know if the problem is specific to the .NET data provider, or if > it's some bug in fbembed.dll itself, though... I maybe wrong but i think the embedded server for 64 bits will need a new GDS implementation. -- Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain Blog: http://carlos

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-18 Thread Dean Harding
Viatcheslav Valerievitch Vassiliev wrote: > First tests of ADO.Net on Firebird 2.1 beta 2 for Win64 are successfull. > C# application runs in 64bit mode and executes simple actions > with embedded Firebird. (I rebuilt ADO.Net provider, without changes in > code for tests, may be official compila

[Firebird-net-provider] Firebird ADO.Net on x64

2007-10-18 Thread Viatcheslav Valerievitch Vassiliev
First tests of ADO.Net on Firebird 2.1 beta 2 for Win64 are successfull. C# application runs in 64bit mode and executes simple actions with embedded Firebird. (I rebuilt ADO.Net provider, without changes in code for tests, may be official compilation will work too). Will ADO.Net provider offici