Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded 64bit and .Net Provider 2.1.0

2009-01-06 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:04, Douglas Tosi wrote: > Honestly, though, the 2.5 alpha tag scares the hell out of me. :) Check the download page. We're in beta stage right now. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com) http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com -

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded 64bit and .Net Provider 2.1.0

2009-01-05 Thread Douglas Tosi
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Dean Harding wrote: > It depends what you're planning to do with it. Just regular usage is pretty > stable, I think most of the new work is in the entity framework support. > Certainly, we've been using it for quite a long time here in production > (64-bit as well)

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded 64bit and .Net Provider 2.1.0

2009-01-05 Thread Dean Harding
] Firebird Embedded 64bit and .Net Provider 2.1.0 Hello! I've want to use Firebird Embedded 64bit. AFAICT it only works with provider 2.5. Honestly, though, the 2.5 alpha tag scares the hell out of me. :) - How difficult is it to backport the 64bit fix to 2.1.0? I'm willing to do it. I s

[Firebird-net-provider] Firebird Embedded 64bit and .Net Provider 2.1.0

2009-01-05 Thread Douglas Tosi
Hello! I've want to use Firebird Embedded 64bit. AFAICT it only works with provider 2.5. Honestly, though, the 2.5 alpha tag scares the hell out of me. :) - How difficult is it to backport the 64bit fix to 2.1.0? I'm willing to do it. I searched svn and jira but couldn't find references to a spec