half
> Of Jiri Cincura
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:10 AM
> To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers
>
> le roy arnaud wrote:
> > for the tables i think that the same prefix could be a good
le roy arnaud wrote:
> for the tables i think that the same prefix could be a good idea but for sp
> i think
> that there are already a prefix
> ex :
> MEMBERSHIP_CREATEUSER
> ROLES_ADDUSERTOROLE
> PROFILES_GETPROPERTIES
We can create a) aliases to keep thinks working b) diff script for SP.
> BTW do you think, that prefix should be each for every provider or same
> for all ASP.NET web providers?
>
> I vote for same.
>
for the tables i think that the same prefix could be a good idea but for sp
i think
that there are already a prefix
ex :
MEMBERSHIP_CREATEUSER
ROLES_ADDUSERTOROLE
P
BTW do you think, that prefix should be each for every provider or same
for all ASP.NET web providers?
I vote for same.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.net email is
Hello:
> What do you think?
Looks fine to me
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
le roy arnaud wrote:
>>> So I propose MP$SOMETHING
>>
>> Looks good, too.
>>
>
> Yes so for tables :
>
> MemberShip Proprider : MP$
> Role Provider : RP$
> Profile Provider : PP$
>
> and the same for proc ?
OK. Ill update names with creating FB2.0 scripts.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.v
>> So I propose MP$SOMETHING
>
> Looks good, too.
>
Yes so for tables :
MemberShip Proprider : MP$
Role Provider : RP$
Profile Provider : PP$
and the same for proc ?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Downl
sasha wrote:
> So I propose MP$SOMETHING
Looks good, too.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE vers
le roy arnaud wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> first i think that we should do the script for the firebird 2.0 .
I'm working on it.
>
>>
>> I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating
>> tables, etc. for membershipshiping.
>>
>
>
>
>> Why to do this.
>>First there's some inconsist
Hi Jiri,
first i think that we should do the script for the firebird 2.0 .
>
> I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating
> tables, etc. for membershipshiping.
>
> Why to do this.
>First there's some inconsistency in these scripts.
Where
> So this would help keep
> Ideas:
> * FB_something
> * FBMemebership_something
> * FBM_something
I think prefix should be:
1) Short
2) Contain $ (in IB/FB traditions)
3) I think prefix FB is unnecessary because it's clear without it
So I propose MP$SOMETHING
-
Madhu Sasidhar, MD wrote:
> Jayadev
> On trying to build, it is asking for the key for a pssword encrypted file
> SC_TemporaryKey.pfx
> what is that - I think it has to do with ClickOnce
>
First, how is this related original thread? If it's new thread, create
new thread!!!
Second, what are you
Jayadev
On trying to build, it is asking for the key for a pssword encrypted file
SC_TemporaryKey.pfx
what is that - I think it has to do with ClickOnce
On 5/3/07, Jiri Cincura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi *,
I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating
tables, etc. for m
Hi *,
I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating
tables, etc. for membershipshiping.
Why to do this. First there's some inconsistency in these scripts. So
this would help keep stuff readable and clean. And second, if there will
be prefix for these objects, on first look
14 matches
Mail list logo
