Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Re: "sealed" class - what a idea it was ?

2006-01-12 Thread Andrzej Kaczmarczyk
1. you can always package the FbDataAdapter with class MyDataAdapter { private FbDataAdapter adapter; } although I can see lots of problems with this approach. 2. secondary leave FbDataAdapter alone and focus instead on DataSets MyDataSet : DataSet is perfectly legal, and you can fill it jus

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Re: "sealed" class - what a idea it was ?

2006-01-12 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: But the main problem is: how to make "own library", when I want to communikate with standard controls (like DataGridView) ? by SourceBindings ? And I think that trying to "adopt" ADO.NET to "non-countable" data-sets is not very hard, if I make my own descendants on ADO.NET classes. But

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Re: "sealed" class - what a idea it was ?

2006-01-12 Thread Jakub Czyzkowski
Hy, But the main problem is: how to make "own library", when I want to communikate with standard controls (like DataGridView) ? by SourceBindings ? And I think that trying to "adopt" ADO.NET to "non-countable" data-sets is not very hard, if I make my own descendants on ADO.NET classes. But the

[Firebird-net-provider] Re: "sealed" class - what a idea it was ?

2006-01-12 Thread sasha
Hi! I also developed applications using delphi since 2003 year and now i am developing applications using ADO.NET. I found that most of ideas implemented in ADO.NET are awful comparing to delphi components (especially comparing to FIBPlus). But it's only MY OPINION. So? in our applications w