Hello:
>> isolation levels with Firebird although
>> that would easily be possible.
>
> I will try to review this one.
Hope, i have this one fixed in my local tree ( on v2.5 sources for now )
--
Carlos Guzmán Ãlvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carlosga.wordpress.com/
Firebird
Hi Carlos,
thanks for the code+clarifications. Is there any hope for dynamic enlistment to
be implemented?
Thomas
""Carlos Guzmán Ãlvarez"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> Hello:
>
>> (b) If Enlist=3Dtrue is given during Open(), but no System.Transaction is =
>
Hello:
> (b) If Enlist=true is given during Open(), but no System.Transaction is
> returned from System.Transaction.Current,
> the data provider crashes.
There some changes on that in the SVN sources for v2.1.0
> (c) The isolation level is hard wired to be ReadCommitted, despite what the
OK, got it:
(e) Because FbConnections cannot be enlisted dynamically but only during Open(),
the prepared command will not need to have the Transaction property set as
it always takes the current enlisted transaction from the connection
during Prepare().
It also means to me, that th
Hi,
I'm having difficulties understanding the System.Transcaction Integration
for FbConnection.
(a) Why is it not possible to enlist in a transaction dynamically?
One has to use Enlist=true in the connection string during Open() to
get a _enlisted_ connection.
What if I want to enlist
