Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Views and Entity Framework

2012-04-06 Thread diegodelafuente
I tried the workaround for views and tables without success. Message 1 The table/view 'Firebird.Firebird.EMPRESA' does not have a primary key defined. The key has been inferred and the definition was created as a read-only table/view. C:\VStudio2010\Turnos .NET - Sebastian\Desarrollo 5-4

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Views and Entity Framework

2011-06-05 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 19:02, Takeshi Kabuto wrote: > "Warning    6    Error 6013: The table/view 'Firebird.Firebird.ORDERS' does > not have a primary key defined and no valid primary key could be inferred. > This table/view has been excluded. To use the entity, you will need to > review your sche

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Views and Entity Framework

2011-06-04 Thread Takeshi Kabuto
I used: COMMENT ON column Orders.ID IS '#PK_GEN#' Orders is a view. When I go to IbExpert application to examine the view. I can see #PK_GEN# in the description column. It seems that the view is ok according the specifications. Then I go to VS2

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Views and Entity Framework

2011-06-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 17:18, Takeshi Kabuto wrote: > Am I doing something wrong or the reason is that #PK_GEN# workaround is > not supported for views? You're doing something wrong. It is supported on views. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3

[Firebird-net-provider] Views and Entity Framework

2011-06-04 Thread Takeshi Kabuto
Does #PK_GEN# technique work for views in the EF? I have added '‘#PK_GEN#' as a comment of an integer column of a view. This column is the primary key of the underlying table. However, the EF does not infer the primary key. Am I doing something wrong or the reason is that #PK_GEN# workaround is n