Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLGetDescRecord usage

2013-02-04 Thread Jojakim
I update myself :-) MS states in the docu: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms710188(v=vs.85).aspx SQLDescribeParam returns the description of a parameter marker associated with a prepared SQL statement. This information is also available in the fields of the IPD. That mea

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Tiesheng Wu
Sorry, I sent out the previous email by mistake. -Original Message- From: Tiesheng Wu [mailto:t...@qmul.ac.uk] Sent: 04 February 2013 11:01 To: firebird-odbc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions OK ~ Tiesheng Wu

[Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLGetDescRecord usage

2013-02-04 Thread Jojakim
Dear all, Apparently, my first post on this subject didn't arrive in the list. So I try again. I assumed, that SQLGetDescXXX functions are OBBC 3 replacements of i.e. SQLDescribeParam. Is this right, or, in ODBC 3 SQLDescribeParam is the right way to get parameter information on a prepared stateme

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
04.02.2013 12:10, Jojakim wrote: > But my question was, how these fields are (or should be) used in the driver > sources. Is this like the standard, or do they have some internal meanings or > special treatments in special cases. And how should they be set up from the > FBs meta data info. It d

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Alexander Potapchenko
Hi, The issues with these functions are unknown. Add information how to reproduce issues into the Tracker - http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/ODBC On 04.02.2013 14:25, Jojakim wrote: > Dear all - and especially the maintainer, > > I try to use the SQLxxxW functions and SQL_C_WCHAR type for

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Jojakim
On 04.02.2013 11:56:58, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 04.02.2013 11:25, Jojakim wrote: >> What is the experts opinion on how octetLength, length, precision, scale and >> displaySize should be handled, and what should they containg depending on the >> FB data type? > > IMHO, standard description is q

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Tiesheng Wu
OK ~ Tiesheng Wu Computer Manager Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Queen Mary, University of London Charterhouse Square London EC1M 6BQ Tel: 020 7882 6285 Fax: 020 7882 6270 Email: t...@qmul.ac.uk Web: http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/ -Original Message-

Re: [Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
04.02.2013 11:25, Jojakim wrote: > What is the experts opinion on how octetLength, length, precision, scale and > displaySize should be handled, and what should they containg depending on the > FB data type? IMHO, standard description is quite clear. For string data length and display size are

[Firebird-odbc-devel] SQLxxxW functions

2013-02-04 Thread Jojakim
Dear all - and especially the maintainer, I try to use the SQLxxxW functions and SQL_C_WCHAR type for accissing the driver and discovered problems with string data trucation etc. Are there knows issues with these functions? As, in the past, I already fixed minor problems in the driver, I wanted