Dear, I can generate a script as a multi file database to create it with
the same structure in another server, thanks
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We stuck using gbak 1.5 to perform backup and restores on remote FB 2.5
databases. Obviously we would like to upgrade the gbak program to version
2.5 and avoid this hack.
Gbak depends on libstdc++.so.6. The repository on this old box only
provides libstdc++.so.5. Is it possible to include the l
>> "insert into TABLE_B (ID, TABLE_A_ID) values (1, 5);"
>> Why does the second transaction wait?
>
>I might be thinking too simple, but for me this looks obvious.
>
>If the first transaction translates to "Update Table_A set ID = 5 where
>ID = 5",
>it does not make too much sense, but shou
> "insert into TABLE_B (ID, TABLE_A_ID) values (1, 5);"
> Why does the second transaction wait?
I might be thinking too simple, but for me this looks obvious.
If the first transaction translates to "Update Table_A set ID = 5
where ID = 5", it does not make too much sense, but should not aff
Hello firebird-support@yahoogroups.com!
I have two tables:
TABLE_A (ID integer)
TABLE_B (ID integer, TABLE_A_ID integer)
TABLE_B.TABLE_A_ID has foreign key to TABLE_A.ID
TABLE_A contains a row e.g. with ID=5
one transaction updates the row with "update TABLE_A set id=id
where id=5", but do
We are using 2.1.5 for production. I just used 2.5 for an experiment.
On 12/08/2013 19:15, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> you write that you have FB2.5 – why you have ODS version 11.1 not 11.2?
> I have 2.5.3 and all DB have ODS11.2
>
> regards,
> Karol Bieniaszewski
>
> From: Tim
Hello, Jorge!
Monday, August 12, 2013, 8:54:17 PM, you wrote:
JAB> http://tkb.amano.com/phpkb/article.php?id=181 could help.
really? This piece of auto-generated crap can help?
You read the description of that "solution"? :-)
In the case of moving db+secondary files
the only HEX editor, or old
Tim,
> I believe the relevant part of the gstat output for the table in
> question to be as below, please let me know if I've got that wrong.
> (Names changed but otherwise unaltered.) My interpretation, which may be
> faulty, of
>
> Average version length: 0.00, total versions: 0, max versions: 0
