Hello all
When you are using File-Based Write Filter is there something Firebird files
which should be excluded.
Start situation is that firebird is installed and configured to work
correctly.
After that you enabled fbwf.
Firebird version 2.5.2.26540.
-br-
Petri
Hello, Thomas!
Saturday, October 12, 2013, 1:06:24 AM, you wrote:
TS> * Running th restore through the Services API/Manager
right, this is the fastest way.
TS> * Provide a larger page cache upon restore, because especially the index
TS> creation step loves RAM. Don't forget to set the page buff
Thomas -
-Original Message-
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Steinmaurer
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:06 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Restore error during unique index creati
> I have a 100GB database that I am trying to run a restore on after a
> successful backup. This is on a new virtual Windows Server 2008 box
> running FB 2.1.5 Classic 32-bit (due to some UDFs that have not been
> ported).
>
> After 26 hours of restore, the process quits with this error:
>
> gbak:
Bob,
> I have a 100GB database that I am trying to run a restore on after a
> successful
> backup. This is on a new virtual Windows Server 2008 box running FB 2.1.5
> Classic 32-bit (due to some UDFs that have not been ported).
>
> After 26 hours of restore, the process quits with this error:
>
I have a 100GB database that I am trying to run a restore on after a
successful backup. This is on a new virtual Windows Server 2008 box running
FB 2.1.5 Classic 32-bit (due to some UDFs that have not been ported).
After 26 hours of restore, the process quits with this error:
gbak:acti
On 10-10-2013 05:02, taqtaq2...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi I have to build a asp.net application that connects to a database
> that is in use with users and passwords.
>
> Someone can explain me how to work everything related to
> MembershipProvider and RoleProvider with Firebird?.
>
> I have no idea ho
On 11/10/2013 13:39, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Duh... No, try this where clause:
AND ( (cast(WIDGET as vacrhar(10)) || '.' starting with
coalesce(:param || '.', '') )
Actually it turns out that EXECUTE STATEMENT goes fast enough, so
although slightly tacky I'll live with that for now.
Thanks for
On 11/10/2013 12:51, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Den 2013-10-11 13:40 skrev Tim Ward såhär:
>
> Yes I know you can't optimise OR, so I'm looking for an alternative
> approach.
>
> I've come across a query in a stored procedure which goes like this:
>
> FOR SELECT FROM
> WHERE ...
> AND ( (WIDGET= :par
Den 2013-10-11 13:40 skrev Tim Ward såhär:
>
> Yes I know you can't optimise OR, so I'm looking for an alternative
> approach.
>
> I've come across a query in a stored procedure which goes like this:
>
> FOR SELECT FROM
> WHERE ...
> AND ( (WIDGET= :param ) OR ( :param is null ) )
> ORDER BY
>
Yes I know you can't optimise OR, so I'm looking for an alternative
approach.
I've come across a query in a stored procedure which goes like this:
FOR SELECT FROM
WHERE ...
AND ( (WIDGET= :param ) OR ( :param is null ) )
ORDER BY
INTO
DO
BEGIN
END
There are two ways in which this procedur
13 matches
Mail list logo
