Hi Mark Rotteveel and group -
Thanks for all the replies. I am in a vicious work cycle (joking).
I will study your replies tonight.
thanks so much,
jim
And thank you
At 10:14 a.m. 15/09/2015, chubmast...@mac.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>Im no IT guy so bear with me. I have a 2009 iMac running os x 10.8It has
>a 640 gb hard drive. Firebird.log is taking up 424 gb. I have a digital
>X-ray program that uses firebird as it's framework. They deny they
At 11:58 a.m. 15/09/2015, chubmast...@mac.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>Actually its a 424 gb log file that increased by 300 gb since sept 10, 2015
Yes, sorry, I noticed that after I posted. ;-)
It won't do any harm to open your new log file in a day or two, and see just
what is happening
Any way I trashed the file without emptying , restarted and everything seems
to work. I'll empty it when convinced no more problems. I wonder if there is
any chance my mac only thought it thought the file was that large.
Hi-
After getting stuck over the weekend, I am getting unstuck thanks to Mark. R,
the group, and the Internet. I watched a slide share presentation done by a
cool Russian on transactions. It helped me visualize what the heck is going on.
I didn't really understand it all that well before the
On 13-9-2015 20:01, thirdshiftco...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> I am just practicing. I might have posted a confusing question before.
>
> I want to see how selects behave differently with being in different
> isolation contexts rather than just running the default snapshot like in
>
On 13-9-2015 04:33, thirdshiftco...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> I read through and practiced with all types of read committed
> transactions with and without wait. I understand those scenarios as they
> apply to read write with, for i.e., update statements.
>
> I am trying to figure out
On 14-9-2015 09:45, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
[firebird-support] wrote:
> On 13-9-2015 04:33, thirdshiftco...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>> I read through and practiced with all types of read committed
>> transactions with and without wait. I understand those scenarios as they
