[firebird-support] secondary server attachments cannot validate databases during gfix

2016-03-09 Thread s3057...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hello Group, I have a server running Firebird 2.5.0 in Classic mode on Windows. There is a database that appears corrupted (internal Firebird consistency check ...). I have got all users out and renamed the file and attempted: gfix -v localhost:C:\data\corrupt.fdb -user sysdba -password

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread russ...@belding.co.nz [firebird-support]
Ah, I did not know that Karol. I'll try this after the UDF problem has been solved. Russell

Re: [firebird-support] AW: different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
09.03.2016 12:18, 'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support] wrote: > the trigger is required because the user can delete the one record, in this > case the > trigger deletes the referenced too. But if I delete the entire Order, the > record will be > delete twice. How can I solve this

[firebird-support] AW: different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread 'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support]
One hint, the trigger is required because the user can delete the one record, in this case the trigger deletes the referenced too. But if I delete the entire Order, the record will be delete twice. How can I solve this in fb 3? Von: Checkmail [mailto:check_m...@satron.de] Gesendet:

[firebird-support] different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread 'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support]
Hello again, now I have in FB3 a problem. A stored Procedure should delete some records. ID some fields ID_AUTOINSERT 123xxx null 234 xxx null 255 xxx 266 266 xxx null Now there is a trigger after delete in this table

AW: AW: [firebird-support] coalesce bug in fb 3.0 rc2?

2016-03-09 Thread 'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support]
Hello, your are right. But in FB 3, it will be handled different. I need the left join tlager_sum, because I’d like to have all records too there no records in tlager_sum. But in this case I get now in fb 3 the tteile.teilenr clean without the amaount of tlager_sum (the a.minb is greater

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
    >>However on this server I first installed FB3 RC2 (64) and saw my database >>managers were 32 bit so I uninstalled FB3 (64)   Russell ___ Hi,   you can use Firebird 64 bit with 32 bit applications - only fbclient.dll must be 32 bit then   regards, Karol Bieniaszewski

Re: [firebird-support] How write a query with a progressive sum field

2016-03-09 Thread Luigi Siciliano luigi...@tiscalinet.it [firebird-support]
Hallo, Il 08/03/2016 20.36, setysvar setys...@gmail.com [firebird-support] ha scritto: > This will not work properly if more than one row of DC are joined to > the same DT (but then your ORDER BY isn't 100% deterministic). If you > change the ordering of your query, you also have to change the

[firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread russ...@belding.co.nz [firebird-support]
Thank you Dimitry for the hint. Using DatabaseWorkbench I instruct the server in which FB3 is installed to use fbclient.dll that comes with FB3. So I am using the this fbClient.dll with all databases I am testing with FB3. The freeUDFLib.dll file is working fine with FB2.5.x on another

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Thanks for suggestions Karol. I am using Win 10 (64) and FB3 (32).  All DLLs are 32 bit, assessed by looking in the DLL files. Russell ,___ I know that this is not so helpfull - byt you do not need to use external functions to extract year or others it exists in firebird itself EXTRACT(YEAR FROM