Hi Alan and all,
Thanks for this further insight into your approach. I am quite new to FB, but
from what I have read I am wondering a few things with this approach. First
looking at Borrie's 2nd edition (p. 729):
"From Firebird 2.0 onward, the USER table is replaced by one named RDB$USERS
a
Hi Alan and all,
Thanks for this further insight into your approach. I am quite new to FB, but
from what I have read I am wondering a few things with this approach. First
looking at Borrie's 2nd edition (p. 729):"From Firebird 2.0 onward, the USER
table is replaced by one named RDB$USERS and isn
---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
> Killing connections by deleting from MON$STATEMENTS requires Firebird
> 2.5 and an ODS 11.2 database (so you will also need to backup and
> restore the database when migrating to Firebird 2.5!).
MON$ATTACHMENTS ;)
Regards,
Vlad
On 2017-02-21 17:32, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> Hi
>
> The problem I'm trying to solve is users leaving inactive db_workbench
> sessions attached to a database while other work is going on by other
> processes, causing a large OIT gap and the consequent problems. The
>