t recommend
earlier. Are firebird made some progress between FB 2.5 SS and FB 2.1 SS
in this subject?
Best Regards,
macma
_WYKLADNIK,
SI_IDJEDNOSTKA, SI_STPOTYPE, SI_CURRENCYPERVALUE
order by max(ke.I_ORDER_INDEX)
Any idea how to overcome this issue?
Best Regards,
macma
++
W dniu 2014-09-03 o 08:31, Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net
[firebird-support] pisze:
> 03.09.2014 09:44, Macma wrote:
>> I found that after upgrade from FireBird 2.1.5 Update 1 to 2.1.6 my
>> query stop working with error "Dynamic SQL Error SQL error code = -104
&
y (select ID from
> >IDY_DO_ZAPYTANIA)
> >group by ke.I_ID_GRUPY, ke.C_SYMBOL, C_OPIS_X, SI_WYKLADNIK,
> >SI_IDJEDNOSTKA, SI_STPOTYPE, SI_CURRENCYPERVALUE
> >order by max(ke.I_ORDER_INDEX)
> >
> >Any idea how to overcome this issue?
>
> Hi Macma!
>
> I w
)
group by ke.I_ID_GRUPY, ke.C_SYMBOL, C_OPIS_X, SI_WYKLADNIK,
SI_IDJEDNOSTKA, SI_STPOTYPE, SI_CURRENCYPERVALUE
order by max(ke.I_ORDER_INDEX)
I have to change "where kk.I_ID_KOSZTY = ko.I_ID_KOSZTY" to
"kk.I_ID_KOSZTY = any (select ID from IDY_DO_ZAPYTANIA)".
Hi,
I have to run Firebird 2.5 in Windows 2012R2 on VMware cluster. All VM
machines will be regularly backup with Veeam Backup. I red that such
backups could cause database file corruption (inconsistency) within the
backup. Is there any method to prevent it?
May by there is some way to use nbacku
Hi,
> Veeam should not create file corruptions, but rather the backup of the
> database could have data from uncommitted transactions, although
> present in the db file, would be ignored by the engine (might show up
> in the log file).
>
My biggest concern was that after restore form Veeam backup
W dniu 2015-08-28 o 18:11, 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com
[firebird-support] pisze:
> You still need to run the test I outlined...
>
> Otherwise, you are making several assumptions. The first, is that I am
> not a blithering idiot who is spouting nonsense!
For now "assumptions" that's all
