Re: [firebird-support] Re: Object in use... wtf???

2013-11-26 Thread Kjell Rilbe

[firebird-support] Re: Object in use... wtf???

2013-11-26 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
26.11.2013 17:03, Kjell Rilbe wrote: > >> Anything wrong with these options etc? > > Tried to add rd.Close after the for loop, but it didn't help. What did > help was to close the connection and reopen it between the select commit > and the starting the transaction for the drop. > > But why is that

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Object in use... wtf???

2013-11-26 Thread Kjell Rilbe

[firebird-support] Re: Object in use... wtf???

2013-11-26 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
26.11.2013 01:54, Kjell Rilbe wrote: > > Scenario, in a single connection I do this: > > 1. Start transaction. > 2. Create table. > 3. Commit. > 4. Start transaction. > 5. Insert rows. > 6. Select using join with other tables. Handles for both INSERT and SELECT statements must be destroyed. > 7.

[firebird-support] Re: "Object in use"

2012-06-30 Thread arda
I'm using Fb 2.5 classic So superserver is the solution? --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "arda" wrote: > > I have web clients, desktop clients and some service applications connected > to the database. And I'm not the only one writing applications on the > database. > > I have great

[firebird-support] Re: "Object in use"

2012-06-29 Thread markopetejan
> I think classic and superclassic do not support meta data change while in > use, only superserver support it. You have to use script to change procedures. Clients will see/use the old version until reconnect. Not so easy with tables though.