[firebird-support] Re: Firebird performance vs PostgreSQL

2017-09-29 Thread Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
29.09.2017 09:50, Ertan Küçükoğlu wrote: > > Answer to your question is yes. KAYNAGAGORE and SEBEBEGORE are not > indexed. Please note that they're not indexed on PostgreSQL, too. > > Question remains as how PostgreSQL can cope with identical data only > with primary key indexes faster than

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird performance vs PostgreSQL

2017-09-29 Thread Ertan Küçükoğlu ertan.kucuko...@1nar.com.tr [firebird-support]
Hello Dmitry, Thank you for your time. I just provided a reproducible sample. I'm not trying to make fine tuning to FirebirdSQL or PostgreSQL. Answer to your question is yes. KAYNAGAGORE and SEBEBEGORE are not indexed. Please note that they're not indexed on PostgreSQL, too. Question remains

[firebird-support] Re: Firebird performance vs PostgreSQL

2017-09-28 Thread Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
29.09.2017 01:08, Ertan Küçükoğlu wrote: Answers can be found in the plans: > PLAN JOIN (RAPOR_EK ORDER rapor_ek_pkey, SORT (DT M NATURAL)) This join plan is terrible for FB. Are KAYNAGAGORE and SEBEBEGORE indexed? They seem not. > Merge Left Join (cost=6600.19..6610.98 rows=560 width=340)

[firebird-support] Re: Firebird performance vs PostgreSQL

2017-09-28 Thread zilez2...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hi, database structures at: https://paste.ee/p/qjTwz https://paste.ee/p/qjTwz Aprox size of tables Artikli = 227.000 rows faktur = 85.000 rows izlaz = 292.000 rows Partneri = 13400 rows Kurs = 180 rows Vrste = 560 rows Porezi = 6 rows Faktype = 30 rows Magacin = 60 rows Query SELECT