[firebird-support] Re: UK based Firebird on Linux expert

2011-11-23 Thread grip_2ls
Lester It is the exact opposite of what we expected too! I should state up front that I did not setup this machine and the person that did has left. However, I do know that the system is running Firebird Classic 2.1 and that we are connecting from a Delphi client running on Windows 7. Looking

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UK based Firebird on Linux expert

2011-11-23 Thread Lester Caine
grip_2ls wrote: It is the exact opposite of what we expected too! I should state up front that I did not setup this machine and the person that did has left. However, I do know that the system is running Firebird Classic 2.1 and that we are connecting from a Delphi client running on Windows

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UK based Firebird on Linux expert

2011-11-23 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:52:30 -, grip_2ls li...@2ls.com wrote: Lester It is the exact opposite of what we expected too! I should state up front that I did not setup this machine and the person that did has left. However, I do know that the system is running Firebird Classic 2.1 and

Re: [firebird-support] Re: UK based Firebird on Linux expert

2011-11-23 Thread Philippe Makowski
2011/11/23 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk grip_2ls wrote: Thanks for that, in which case the output is the following: /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 536G 135G 402G 26% / so not on the ntfs but the xfs partition. So I don't think that we can blame ntfs in this instance. xfs ok for