On 27/09/16 19:01, Carlos Mazariegos carlosemazarieg...@gmail.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
> The vulnerability that reported Palo Alto is:
>
>
> * *Unique Threat Id:* 31633
> * *Descriptión:* Ther exists a buffer overflow vulnerability in
> Borland Interbase server.
Which has nothing
27.09.2016 20:01, Carlos Mazariegos carlosemazarieg...@gmail.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
> The vulnerability that reported Palo Alto is:
"Borland Interbase 2007 Packet Processing Buffer Overflow". Firebird is not
Interbase.
Do you have a relevant exploit?
--
WBR, SD.
Hi,
The vulnerability that reported Palo Alto is:
- *Unique Threat Id:* 31633
- *Descriptión:* Ther exists a buffer overflow vulnerability in Borland
Interbase server. The vulnerability is due to lack of boundary protection
while processing Connect Requests (Opcode 0x01). A remote
On 26-9-2016 22:56, Carlos Mazariegos carlosemazarieg...@gmail.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
> I understand firebird is not equal interbase,
> but the problem is that the Firewall Palo Alto,
> Palo Alto detected the vulnerability with my application, which is built
> with:
It didn't detect the
Hello,
I understand firebird is not equal interbase,
but the problem is that the Firewall Palo Alto,
Palo Alto detected the vulnerability with my application, which is built
with:
- Java EE 7
- Glassfish 4.1
- Firebird Superserver 2.5.5.
researching on the internet I found that firebird
24.09.2016 18:53, carlosemazarieg...@gmail.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> I have problems with firebird Vulnerability, Palo Alto reports the following
> error:
>
> Borland Interbase Database Message Handling Bufer Overflow Vulnerability.
Interbase is not Firebird. Firebird is not Interbase.
Hi
I have Firebird 2.5.5 on Centos 7.
I have problems with firebird Vulnerability, Palo Alto reports the following
error:
Borland Interbase Database Message Handling Bufer Overflow Vulnerability.
In some Internet sites reported by Windows, This vulnerability is generated by
a remote
