On 13-2-2019 07:57, wang...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> firebird 1.5 linux built is for 32 bits, is it possible to install it in
> a 64 bit linux? Thanks.
Firebird 1.5 has been unsupported for almost 10 years now. It is really
time to start upgrading.
I think the only way is to try it
> firebird 1.5 linux built is for 32 bits, is it possible to install it
> in a 64 bit linux? Thanks.
As long as your 64Bit Linux does have support for 32Bit and the required
32Bit runtimes are installed it should be possible to install.
Hi,
firebird 1.5 linux built is for 32 bits, is it possible to install it in a 64
bit linux? Thanks.
Hi
I renamed the setup and worked.
I use it to migrate some customers databases that are still in 1.5 version.
Thank you
Manuel
On 12-1-2018 19:10, fo...@darsys.com.ar [firebird-support] wrote:
> I can't install FB 1.5 on my Windows 10 32b
>
> I get "this app can't run on this PC"
>
> In "more information" opens MS page that says "your app does not work on
> your PC.
>
> In adition, I had it installed it. I think it was
Why, oh why, do you even have a copy of FB 1.5 to use? It has been long left
behind by the Firebird project. Unsupported for years.
Try a more recent version!
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:10:28 -0500 fo...@darsys.com.ar [firebird-support]
wrote
Hi
I can't install FB 1.5 on my Windows 10 32b
I get "this app can't run on this PC"
In "more information" opens MS page that says "your app does not work on your
PC.
In adition, I had it installed it. I think it was unistalled by Windows Update.
Antivirus Eset
TIA
Manuel
Both databases have dialect 1 and that means that case in table names and
quotation is irrelevant. I managed to call generator from 1.5 database but
tables are not accessible still from the Active record infrastrcture:
$list = Yii::$app->db->createCommand('select gen_id(contract_ino, 1) from
Jonatan,
> I can connect to both Firebird 1.5 and 2.1 databases, but only from 2.1
> database I can read table data. When I am trying to read data from Firebird
> 1.5 database I receive message:
>
> Invalid Configuration
> The table does not exist: BANKS
> 0
> yii\base\InvalidConfigException
>
>
I am trying to use Firebird 1.5 database with Yii with Yii-Firebird extension
yii2-firebird | Extension | Yii PHP Framework
http://www.yiiframework.com/extension/yii2-firebird/
http://www.yiiframework.com/extension/yii2-firebird/
yii2-firebird | Extension | Yii PHP Framework
http://www.
Thanks Helen for this thorough explanation.
I decided to keep the db running on windows and try to access it from linux.
robert
On 10.05.2016 22:25, Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au
[firebird-support] wrote:
> Hello robert,
>
> Wednesday, May 11, 2016, 3:47:19 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I got a databa
Hello robert,
Wednesday, May 11, 2016, 3:47:19 AM, you wrote:
> I got a database that was created with a firebird 1.5 on windows.
> Now I installed Firebird-1.5.2.4731-Win32.exe an a windows 7 and on a
> windows 10 machine.
> I copied also the following files into the UDF folder:
> MD5
> Udf
Hi friends in firebird,
I got a database that was created with a firebird 1.5 on windows.
Now I installed Firebird-1.5.2.4731-Win32.exe an a windows 7 and on a
windows 10 machine.
I copied also the following files into the UDF folder:
MD5
UdfArithmetic
UdfArithmetic.dll
UdfControl
UdfC
>Hey guys,
>
>I'm having some issues with a time difference on a server - the software we've
>built around Firebird checks that the client and server do not have a
>time different of more than 30 minutes otherwise certain functionality is
>disabled.
>
>Now the server time is fine, but when query
Hey guys,
I'm having some issues with a time difference on a server - the software we've
built around Firebird checks that the client and server do not have a time
different of more than 30 minutes otherwise certain functionality is disabled.
Now the server time is fine, but when querying
on it. After making
sure everything is working right with 2.5.2, we then upgrade our first server.
-HalimTo: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:51:17 -0600
Subject: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer Hardware
-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 21:42
> Para: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> Assunto: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer Hardware but bad
> performance
>
>
>
>
>
> We recently upgraded our database server from Win server 2003 to Win 2008
> server. We upgra
” (without
cache) instead of a “Database serve”.
De: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 21:42
Para: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Assunto: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer Hardware but bad
Will do.Thank you.-Halim
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:31:07 +0400
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer Hardware but
bad performance
you,
-Halim
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:06:04 +0400
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer
Hardware but bad performance
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:06:04 +0400
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 1.5 on 64bit OS. Newer Hardware but
bad performance
Halim,
It is out of context. Recent 2.5.2 has no such problem.
Where did you read it?
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
Halim,
It is out of context. Recent 2.5.2 has no such problem.
Where did you read it?
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
30.05.2014 4:41 пользователь "halim1...@hotmail.com [firebird-support]" <
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> написал:
>
>
> We recently upgraded our database server from Win se
We recently upgraded our database server from Win server 2003 to Win 2008
server. We upgraded hardware as well.
The new hardware (IBM x3550 M4) is way more advanced than the old one. 4 times
the RAM and CPU speed.
We ran some tests on the new hardware(a few select/update queries), the
performa
Yes, thanks, that's made the performance between the two queries comparable
again.
---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>I have a simple query:
>
>SELECT first 1 ITEM_DATE FROM HISTORY
>WHERE ITEM_ID = 'ITEM_ID_123456'
>and ITEM_TYPE = 'TYPE1'
>AND ITEM_STATUS > 200 and
>I have a simple query:
>
>SELECT first 1 ITEM_DATE FROM HISTORY
>WHERE ITEM_ID = 'ITEM_ID_123456'
>and ITEM_TYPE = 'TYPE1'
>AND ITEM_STATUS > 200 and ITEM_STATUS <> 310
>ORDER BY ITEM_DATE ASC
>
>Which runs in about 1.5 seconds. If I remove the Order by it's less than
>100ms. There are only three
Hi,
I have a simple query:
SELECT first 1 ITEM_DATE FROM HISTORY
WHERE ITEM_ID = 'ITEM_ID_123456'
and ITEM_TYPE = 'TYPE1'
AND ITEM_STATUS > 200 and ITEM_STATUS <> 310
ORDER BY ITEM_DATE ASC
Which runs in about 1.5 seconds. If I remove the Order by it's less than
100ms. There are o
Hi,
I have a FB 1.5 classic running in OS X, now I need to install FB 2.5 into the
same machine, is this possible? and how to do that ? Thanks,
wang
We have a process in FB 1.5 (Linux) that has a very long runtime
2952 firebird 20 0 9900 7412 2848 S5 0.2 287:21.12 fb_inet_server
287:21.12 is the CPU time. Is there any tool that will tell us what the
process is stuck on? e.g what sql query it is currently executing.
regards
Chris
Hi there, we have a process running on our firebird 1.5 server that has quite a
long run time
2952 firebird 20 0 9900 7412 2848 S 11 0.2 285:28.97 fb_inet_server
285:28.97 is the CPU time for this process. Is there a tool for looking into
what this process is stuck on?
regards
Chris
Sean,
>
> I am 99.9% sure that the limit applies to data not counting blobs.
>
The limit on table size does not include the actual size of blobs, but
considers each blob to be eight bytes long. Advance yourself to 100%
confident.
Cheers,
Ann
> I have a Firebird 1.5 database that has grown up to 26.6 Gb. Most of the data
> is stored in one single table that holds a memo field. I'm worried about the
> size of this table, because as far as I know the maximun table size for
> version 1.5 is about 36 Gb and I guess I'll soon get close to t
Em 14/2/2012 22:46, Nando escreveu:
> Hi to all,
>
> I have a Firebird 1.5 database that has grown up to 26.6 Gb. Most of the data
> is stored in one single table that holds a memo field. I'm worried about the
> size of this table, because as far as I know the maximun table size for
> version 1.
Hi to all,
I have a Firebird 1.5 database that has grown up to 26.6 Gb. Most of the data
is stored in one single table that holds a memo field. I'm worried about the
size of this table, because as far as I know the maximun table size for version
1.5 is about 36 Gb and I guess I'll soon get clos
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Elmar Haneke wrote:
>
>
> Problems may arise since the Server is not fully compatible - SQL
> working on 1.5 might fail on 2.5.
>
That's an application problem, not related to the fbclient version.
The project goal, generally, is to allow gradual upgrades rather
> This is probably a stupid question but here goes anyway. I have a Delphi
> application that is currently running on FB1.5. I need to move to FB2.5. Is
> it necessary to update the FB client on the client PC's from 1.5 to 2.5 or is
> the 1.5 client compatible with the 2.5 database?
> I have fo
> This is probably a stupid question but here goes anyway. I have a Delphi
> application that is currently running on FB1.5. I need to move to FB2.5. Is
> it necessary to update the FB client on the client PC's from 1.5 to 2.5 or is
> the 1.5 client compatible with the 2.5 database?
> I have fou
This is probably a stupid question but here goes anyway. I have a Delphi
application that is currently running on FB1.5. I need to move to FB2.5. Is it
necessary to update the FB client on the client PC's from 1.5 to 2.5 or is the
1.5 client compatible with the 2.5 database?
I have found that PC
Nando wrote:
>> ISC ERROR CODE:335544348
>> no current record for fetch operation.
Use LEFT JOIN:
http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq144
--
Milan Babuskov
==
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==
>Hi,
>
>I'm having trouble with this simple stored procedure:
>
>SET TERM !! ;
>CREATE PROCEDURE test_proc (d_date TIMESTAMP)
> RETURNS (Result CHAR(50))
>AS BEGIN
> Result = CAST(d_date AS CHAR(50));
> SUSPEND;
>END !!
>SET TERM ; !!
>
>If I execute this statement it works fine:
>
>"SELECT a.my
Hi,
I'm having trouble with this simple stored procedure:
SET TERM !! ;
CREATE PROCEDURE test_proc (d_date TIMESTAMP)
RETURNS (Result CHAR(50))
AS BEGIN
Result = CAST(d_date AS CHAR(50));
SUSPEND;
END !!
SET TERM ; !!
If I execute this statement it works fine:
"SELECT a.my_id, a.some_date
40 matches
Mail list logo