Hi
I'd like to do my backup without gc and then do the gc separately -
is there any effective difference between doing "gbak with gc" and
"gbak without gc" and then "gfix -sweep"
Nick Upson, Telensa Ltd, Senior Operations Network Engineer
direct +44 (0) 1799 533252, support hotline +44 (0) 179
> On Apr 5, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
> wrote:
>
>
> is there any effective difference between doing "gbak with gc" and
> "gbak without gc" and then "gfix -sweep"
The only differences (that I can think of) are caused by concurrent actions. If
you garb
> great thanks
>
> to make sure I've got this right
>
> starting with the same database I can do either
>
> a) gbak with gc
>
> b) gbak without gc and gfix -sweep
>
> and I will have the same final result
>
>
> Extending this further, how can identify which tables contain (or did
> contain) the gar
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
> wrote:
>
> to make sure I've got this right
Not quite.
>
> starting with the same database I can do either
>
> a) gbak with gc
Won't advance the oldest active
>
> b) gbak without gc and gfix -sweep
Will move
great thanks
to make sure I've got this right
starting with the same database I can do either
a) gbak with gc
b) gbak without gc and gfix -sweep
and I will have the same final result
Extending this further, how can identify which tables contain (or did
contain) the garbage.
As well as handl
