On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:10 PM, eMeL wrote:
>
>> isc_tpb_read_committed + isc_tpb_no_rec_version
>
> I think it is. This use the less record version page and wait nothing
> for updated records.
It's great if you like getting an error every time you encounter an
uncommitted write. Generally the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:38 AM, nathanelrick wrote:
>
> what is the most fastest isolation level ?
> i know the behavior of each, but i need to know the difference in speed /
> resource usage between each of them ...
>
> isc_tpb_concurrency
> isc_tpb_consistency
> isc_tpb_read_committed + isc_tp
> isc_tpb_read_committed + isc_tpb_no_rec_version
I think it is. This use the less record version page and wait nothing
for updated records.
eMeL
hello,
what is the most fastest isolation level ?
i know the behavior of each, but i need to know the difference in speed /
resource usage between each of them ...
isc_tpb_concurrency
isc_tpb_consistency
isc_tpb_read_committed + isc_tpb_rec_version
isc_tpb_read_committed + isc_tpb_no_rec_versio
