wobble...@yahoo.co.uk,
> is there a good and up to date official source of documentation on
> firebird.conf
The firebird.conf file itself, version current for the Fb version you
are using. You won't get more up to date than that anywhere.
For Fb3, which allows per-database config for a lot of
pa
30.07.2018 12:01, wobble...@yahoo.co.uk [firebird-support] wrote:
> is there a good and up to date official source of documentation on
> firebird.conf and other
> admin?
Description of firebird.conf is inside of it.
--
WBR, SD.
---
Ian wrote:
> We got the idea from The Firebird Book, and after that I can't find
> mention of it being deprecated in 2.0 release notes or later.
Not deprecated but abolished. If something is "deprecated", it is
still valid but likely to be dropped in a subsequent release. From Fb
2 onward, Fb wa
> 27.07.2018 21:41, Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
>> I don't know where you got the idea that you could specify the size of
>> a temp directory.
Dmitry replied
>It is an Interbase feature.
Uh...ok... @_@
If you want to allocate specific spaces for your temp di
27.07.2018 21:41, Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
> I don't know where you got the idea that you could specify the size of
> a temp directory.
It is an Interbase feature.
--
WBR, SD.
wobble...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> I've just tried
> TempDirectories = /location1 5000 ;/location2 ; /location3
> And location1 is ignored, but 2 and 3 used!
Which tells you something. ;-)
The engine doesn't recognise the format of the first member of the
list but it's OK with the second a
On 10-6-2012 12:32, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 10.06.2012 14:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>> * for each record (sequential read of all pages?)
>> * insert column value into index
>
> Inserting unsorted / random values into the b-tree is known to be much
> slower than sorting the values in advance and
On 8-6-2012 18:07, Ann Harrison wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Alec Swan wrote:
>
>> Thanks Vlad, but this is too complicated to give as a guidance to our
>> customers. However, it sounds like rebuilding an index cannot require more
>> space that the database size itself, right?
>
>
> O
Alex,
> However, it sounds like rebuilding an index cannot require more
> space that the database size itself, right?
Correct, in order to build the index, the engine must build and sort a
projection of the index values.
So, if you build an index on a string [say varchar(100)] column which is o
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Alec Swan wrote:
> Thanks Vlad, but this is too complicated to give as a guidance to our
> customers. However, it sounds like rebuilding an index cannot require more
> space that the database size itself, right?
On a bad day, yes it could. To have a day that ba
Thanks Vlad, but this is too complicated to give as a guidance to our
customers. However, it sounds like rebuilding an index cannot require more
space that the database size itself, right?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:22 AM, hvlad wrote:
> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Alec S
11 matches
Mail list logo
