Jerry, List, Krassimir,
At 09:40 PM 17/11/2010, Jerry LR Chandler wrote:
>John, List:
>
>A simple semiotic flaw exists in this paper.
>
>So, I am not buying into the hypothesis or the conclusions.
>Reality is far more perplex than mere technical terms.
>
>Given the situation, who else can find t
Dear John and FIS colleages,
I much agree (below) with the return to the biological; also Gordana and
Raquel had already argued along these guidelines. It does not mean that
things become very much clearer initially in the connection between
information and intelligence, but there is room for
Pedro et al.,
My previous cautionary post did not get much traction in this thread, but I
still think my point was an important one to ensure that we are all talking
about the same thing. My point was that “intelligence” in inherently
subjective (in the eye of the beholder), unless we can agre
