Dear Loet, Bob, Joseph, and FIS colleagues,
There is a classical problem in the dialog between natural science and
the humanities, also occurring in the present exchanges (maybe in a
different way). I may agree or disagree respect the constructs presented
by Bob, or my own points, but most of
However, most of Loet's text is discursive, with ample freedom of
construction, and the parts associated to scientific conceptualizations do
not become very relevant --in my opinion they provide a loan of apparent
rigor. Besides the topic of discussion in his message is slightly twisted:
the
