Yes, Happy New Year to all! . . . But, I confess to some confusion.
● On seeing the offered New Years session, I wondered 'Why? Hasn't this
issue long been overtaken by events?' Still I was happy to follow along and
see if I might learn something new . . . but it seems my initial intuition
was cor
I like this response from Lou,Otto
From: Louis H Kauffman
To: Pedro C. Marijuan
Cc: fis
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] A Curious Story
Dear Folks,It is very important to not be hasty and assume that the warning
Professor Rossler made is to be taken ser
From: "tozziart...@libero.it"
To: fis
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:32 PM
Subject: [Fis] Game over! A Curious Story
"The operation of the LHC is safe, not only in the old sense of that word, but
in the more general sense that our most qualified scientists have thoroughly
co
Dear Plamen:
I love your response.But: it misses my point: The fact that I have provided a
proof since 9 years' time (often published) as to why the experiment represents
a sizeable risk. Everyone in physics is invited to invalidate my proof.
I am not against taking unknown risks in science. I a
great
From: Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
To: tozziart...@libero.it
Cc: fis
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] Game over! A Curious Story
Well, these are only citations. What if all of them are wrong?
What if the data that were measured are incorrect?
We have had
Dear All,
I follow O. Rössler's concerns for a few years.
As a physicist (who is probably not the best specialist in the black
hole physics), I do not want to involve in detailed physical
explanations and mathematical proofs for information specialists, not
certainly specialised in physics.
I conform with Geörgyi's tale.
From: Gyorgy Darvas
To: fis
Cc: Otto E. Rossler ; Louis H Kauffman ;
Pedro C. Marijuan
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] A Curious Story
Dear All, I follow O. Rössler's concerns for a few years. As a physicist (who
is pr
Dear Prof. Roessler:
My training in quantum physics lies over a half-century in the past, so I
cannot add or detract from the specifics of this issue without exposing my
ignorance. I can only respond as an engineer with a devotion to the field
of dimensional analysis.
I note that the Planck const
Dear Terry,
Are you really sure that looking at linking Shannon to higher-order conceptions
of information like meaning is a realistic ambition?
I compare that to linking the width of a street to the individual motivations
of the persons that will walk in the street.
As we know, Shannon is to mea
Dear Otto,
On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:05, Otto E. Rossler wrote:
Dear Plamen:
I love your response.
But: it misses my point: The fact that I have provided a proof since
9 years' time (often published) as to why the experiment represents
a sizeable risk. Everyone in physics is invited to invali
Thank you very much, dear Bob (if I may call you so) for your open letter which
could as well have come from Dirac himself (whom my wife and I once met when we
attended the same conference in Miami).
I realize I have a little contribution to make with my suggested answer for
you:
c-global impl
Dear Bruno:
You are the same fair mind as ever. Rare contacts never destroy
friendships.Since you asked, I have a new result, it is due to Einstein up
until 19011, but was given up by him at the time through an oversight (his mind
had been "seared" by thinking too much bout the equivalence princ
https://www.researchgate.net/search.Search.html?type=publication&query=szilamandee
From: Otto E. Rossler
To: Gyorgy Darvas ; fis
Cc: Louis H Kauffman ; Pedro C. Marijuan
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Fis] A Curious Story
I conform with Geörgyi's tale.
13 matches
Mail list logo
