Dear Loet and colleagues,
One of the advantages of a new discipline is the simplification of
discourse, the creation of a new space where you can easily build new
knowledge without copious management of other unnecessary,
circumstantial ideas. I have already quoted in this list the famous
quo
Dear Colleagues,
In all humility, I have asked why a non-standard logic of processes might not
transcend our specializations as part of the 'provisional solution'. I would
still hope to get a response to my question in this cosmic cycle . . .
If we look at Terry's note of October 25, we can see
Hi FISers,
Reading the recent posts on "information" and related issues by Terry, Joseph,
Pedro, Mark, Krassimir, Loet, and others suggested to me the following
possible definition of information (see Table 1) that may be consistent with
those proposed by Terry, Shannon, Volkenstein, Saussur
On 27 Oct 2017 at 3:09 AM, Loet Leydesdorff wrote:
the cogitatum which transcends us is intersubjectivity. It is not physical. The
physical is res extensa, whereas this remains res cogitans.
Loet, let me hope this will not merely be a quibble about the terms. We may
say that the physic
