Dear Pedro,
your wise comments are no less inspiring for me than the last comments
by Loet, namely that the concept of information is 'relative' to each
context (and therefore 'objective' with regard to such context). This
happens with other concepts too, of course. I said this in my PhD
Dear Arturo and FISers
We will forgive your life! Some other people in this list also have
strong reservations to a single, canonical approach to information,
either from Shannon, Boltzmann, or Fisher backgrounds. In my case,
mostly biologically and socially grounded ("sociotype"), I see a
: Sunday, 11 December 2016 10:21 PM
To: tozziart...@libero.it
Cc: fis <fis@listas.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [Fis] A provocative issue
Bravo Arturo - I totally agree - in a paper I co-authored with Stuart Kauffman
and others we talked abut the relativity of
information and the fact that infor
Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Associate
Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal
http://web.ncf.ca/collier
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of
tozziart...@libero.it
Sent: Sunday, 11 December 2016 5:57 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] A provocative issue
Dear
Bravo Arturo - I totally agree - in a paper I co-authored with Stuart Kauffman
and others we talked abut the relativity of
information and the fact that information is not an absolute. Here is the
abstract of the paper and an excerpt from the paper that discusses the
relativity of information.
