Hi, Pedro.
I didnt receive th image (Figure 1. The Four Great Domains of Science)
Would you please send it again?
Thank you.
Moises
2015-01-17 9:00 GMT-02:00 :
> Send Fis mailing list submissions to
> fis@listas.unizar.es
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
It would be satisfying perhaps to think of our collective work as at the
forefront of the development of what will become A Grand Domain of Science,
but I would say the better trend in current science is toward careful
integration between domains rather than toward established grand divisions,
whic
Jeremy -- It is no longer so easy to declare that the physicochemical realm
has no end-rirectednes. There is a burgeoning viewpoint -- the maximizing
entropy production principle (MEPP) -- that proposes an end for all actions
and activities whatever.
In my version, it is the constitutively poor e
Thanks Moises, here it is --in case the list server suppresses the image
again, the dropbox link below contains the image too (at the end of the
philoinfo paper, belonging to the Proceedings of the Xian Conference,
2013). best ---Pedro
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wslnk41c3lquc55/AADpm_U6xuhm6jH
Hi Pedro,
Thanks for sharing this beautiful and instructive image. I wonder if
it should actually be more accurate as a higher dimensional graph or
if rather than ambiguous overlap if there is some degree of
containment in these relationships.
— Terry
On 1/19/15, Pedro C. Marijuan wrote:
> Than
... in 3-space perhaps a tetrahedron instead of a 4-leaf clover, such
that each of the 4 academic domains were more equidistant from one
another.
On 1/19/15, Terrence W. DEACON wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Thanks for sharing this beautiful and instructive image. I wonder if
> it should actually be more
Pedro, this image is strongly related to my research.
My graduation and master degree was in Physics. But now I am in IS world
through PhD program of IBICT/UFRJ in Brazil.
As you, Jorge and Raquel said (Navarro, Moral, Marijuan, 2013), IS is about
to become one of four great scientific domains. Don
Hi Guy.
It seams that you sent your message only to me :-)
I am forwarding now to FIS
By the way, "Domain Analisys" as in Knowledge Organization (Hjørland,
Birger. "Domain analysis in information science: eleven
approaches–traditional as well as innovative." Journal of documentation
58.4 (2002): 42
Dear Moises, Guy, Stan---and colleagues,
I would not agree with the "silo" interpretation of scientific domains,
at least that's not the way Rosenbloom and many others (myself included)
understand them. See the reference mentioned below by Moises and my own
(Scientomics: An emergent perspectiv
I agree with Pedro.
That is the way I understand that the concept of "Domain" must be discussed
in Information Science.
About the "explosion" in number of disciplines, this is analized and called
"Knowledge Pathology (Patologia do Saber)" by Hilton Japiassu (a great
brazilian philosopher) and in hi
10 matches
Mail list logo
