[Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-11 Thread Joseph Brenner
Dear Hans and All, This is a very useful form of responses, which enables further directed comments. I start with Lars', which is perhaps as Hans says crucial: Lars -- How does QBism differ from Copenhagen? This is a crucial question. It differs not at all in the formalism, and only subtly in

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-11 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
Having a proper view of physics among the many possible is critical to placing information theory on a sound basis. I have proposed Logic in Reality as one way of giving meaning to the statement that energy and information processes are non-separably related and how they are related. Are there othe

Re: [Fis] FW: Responses

2014-01-12 Thread Robert E. Ulanowicz
y a system > can bring > some clarification (see http://www.mdpi.org/entropy/papers/e5020193.pdf). > > Hope this helps > > Christophe > > > > > > From: lo...@physics.utoronto.ca > Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:49:28 -0500 > To: gordana.dodig-crnko...@mdh.se &g

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-16 Thread Bob Logan
Hi Christophe - I enjoyed your response - full of meaningful information - :-) Your point is well taken. I agree what might be meaningful information for one agent might be meaningless for another. I can add another example to your list of examples which I encountered some time ago. An author w

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-21 Thread Robert E. Ulanowicz
> The reason of being of information, whatever its content or quantity, is > to be used by an agent (biological or artificial). Dear Christophe, In making this restriction you are limiting the domain of information to communication and excluding all information that inheres in structure per-se.

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-22 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
ific difference of a mathematical concept of information. (Perhaps, it is easier to use "uncertainty" for this mathematical concept.) Best wishes, Loet -Original Message----- From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Robert E. Ulanowicz Sent: Tuesday, January

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-22 Thread John Collier
At 09:45 PM 2014-01-21, Robert E. Ulanowicz wrote: > The reason of being of information, whatever its content or quantity, is > to be used by an agent (biological or artificial). Dear Christophe, In making this restriction you are limiting the domain of information to communication and excluding

Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses

2014-01-22 Thread Christophe
Dear Bob U, If your are talking about resident information, as available for usage, I take it as being part of information that can be used by the agent. Let me go through John's paper (thanks John). Best Christophe > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:45:15 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: