...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Robert E. Ulanowicz
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:45 PM
To: Christophe
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses
The reason of being of information, whatever its content or quantity,
is to be used by an agent (biological or artificial).
Dear Christophe
At 09:45 PM 2014-01-21, Robert E. Ulanowicz wrote:
The reason of being of
information, whatever its content or quantity, is
to be used by an agent (biological or artificial).
Dear Christophe,
In making this restriction you are limiting the domain of information
to
communication and excluding
Dear Bob U,
If your are talking about resident information, as available for usage, I take
it as being part of information that can be used by the agent.
Let me go through John's paper (thanks John).
Best
Christophe
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:45:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses
The reason of being of information, whatever its content or quantity, is
to be used by an agent (biological or artificial).
Dear Christophe,
In making this restriction you are limiting the domain of information to
communication and excluding all information that inheres in structure
per-se.
Hi Christophe - I enjoyed your response - full of meaningful information - :-)
Your point is well taken. I agree what might be meaningful information for one
agent might be meaningless for another. I can add another example to your list
of examples which I encountered some time ago. An author
: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: Responses
Dear Friends - I have been lurking as far as the discussion of Shannon
information is concerned. I must confess I am a bit confused by the use of
the term information associated with what you folks call Shannon
information. To my way
Dear Hans and All,
This is a very useful form of responses, which enables further directed
comments. I start with Lars', which is perhaps as Hans says crucial:
Lars -- How does QBism differ from Copenhagen? This is a crucial question. It
differs not at all in the formalism, and only subtly
Having a proper view of physics among the many possible is critical to
placing information theory on a sound basis. I have proposed Logic in
Reality as one way of giving meaning to the statement that energy and
information processes are non-separably related and how they are related.
Are there
