Re: [Fish-users] Fish-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 6

2012-06-01 Thread Peter Flood
On 01/06/2012 22:54, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: I am dealing with a somewhat large and C++ code base at work right now, written by extremely clever people who wanted to try out some extremely clever ideas. Exceedingly fed up with C++ right now; a conversation about the merits of C++ would not be

Re: [Fish-users] Announcing Open Beta for our fancy new fish fork

2012-06-01 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
> A short stabilization period sounds good, but there ought to be no need to > cherry-pick at all. The file renaming was done through git, which is smart > enough to apply patches to files under their new name. Any changes to > master can simply be merged to fish_fish like any other branch. > I di

Re: [Fish-users] Announcing Open Beta for our fancy new fish fork

2012-06-01 Thread ridiculous_fish
On Jun 1, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > 2012/6/1 Jan Kanis > > * Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase? > * Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish the > default feature branch of fish? > > There hasn't been any offi

Re: [Fish-users] Announcing Open Beta for our fancy new fish fork

2012-06-01 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
2012/6/1 Jan Kanis > > * Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase? >> * Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish >> the default feature branch of fish? >> > > There hasn't been any official structure in who are considered > maintainers. Pe

Re: [Fish-users] Fish-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 6

2012-06-01 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
2012/6/1 ridiculous_fish > Hello Axel! I am honored to hear from you. > > I must thank you for fish. It was (and still is) an inspiration for me, > both in > its technical design, and also its user-facing simplicity and elegance > relative > to its peers. Aw man... Thanks! :-) BTW, I'm guessi

Re: [Fish-users] fish_fish

2012-06-01 Thread Axel Liljencrantz
2012/6/1 Maxim Gonchar > But for fish it is not the case, because 'if' is the command as well. >>> It took some time for me to understand that I can do this in fish in the >>> following way: >>>cmd1 args1; and cmd2 args2 >>>if and cmd3 args3 >>>#some code >>>end >>> >>> >> Coo

Re: [Fish-users] fish_fish

2012-06-01 Thread ridiculous_fish
On May 31, 2012, at 1:13 AM, Maxim Gonchar wrote: >>> 6) I like the idea of autosuggestions, I feel very comfortable and natural >>> with them. I would suggest to add the possibility to set a color to the >>> auto-suggested part (blinking?). >>> Now it's the same as the other part of the comman

Re: [Fish-users] Announcing Open Beta for our fancy new fish fork

2012-06-01 Thread Jan Kanis
> * Who, if anybody has been maintaining the non-fishfish fish codebase? > * Does that person (if s/he exists) have any problem with making fishfish > the default feature branch of fish? > There hasn't been any official structure in who are considered maintainers. People who've had code to commit

Re: [Fish-users] Fish-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 6

2012-06-01 Thread Martin Bähr
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:07:18PM -0700, ridiculous_fish wrote: > I view C++ like drinking from a beer bong: a little is nice, but if you don't > control yourself it's easy to swallow too much and wake up the following day > with a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor in

Re: [Fish-users] fish_fish

2012-06-01 Thread Maxim Gonchar
>> But for fish it is not the case, because 'if' is the command as well. >> It took some time for me to understand that I can do this in fish in the >> following way: >> cmd1 args1; and cmd2 args2 >> if and cmd3 args3 >> #some code >> end >> > > Cool. I hadn't though of doing it