On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:40:00AM +0100, SanskritFritz wrote:
do you get the same missing history entry if you disable the function?
Yes.
so the function has nothing to do with it.
what happens if you just start another shell? bash or fish?
or if you use sudo instead of su?
also, does it
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Martin Bähr
mba...@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
also, does it make a difference if you use su; vs su -;
Using 'su -' gives me a completely different history, i think it is from
directly logging into root from a console long time ago.
ah, not i
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Christopher Nilsson
christop...@otherchirps.net wrote:
I've had a go at recreating this problem, but haven't had any luck so far.
:( On my (ubuntu) system, I'm seeing all history items correctly. That is,
none are being skipped as you're seeing.
So far
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:13:21PM +0100, SanskritFritz wrote:
Maybe worth mentioning, the su command is a function here, because of bash
being the default shell in archlinux:
su function su
su --shell=/usr/bin/fish $argv
end
do you get the same missing history entry if you
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net nore...@sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:52 PM
Subject: [ fish-Bugs-3115560 ] last history element missing after su
To: nore...@sourceforge.net
Bugs item #3115560, was opened at 2010-11-22 15:52
Message generated
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.comwrote:
I've read a proposal about using the sf.net bug tracker. Here is a real
example then (it is an actual bug report), see if it is usable for you:
-- Forwarded message --
From: SourceForge.net
