This message is from: "Beaver Dam Farm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hello from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm in Nova Scotia

We had our first snowfall last night. Only about 4", but heavy so the power went out for about 8 hours. It didn't bother us much as we have the woodstove in the house, and all the horse's tanks were filled and the temp. stayed just above freezing.

It being a snowy day today, I spent the morning on the computer and looked at the NFHR website to see what's new. -- The Evaluation Committee's excellent work, "The Evaluation Handbook" was new -- New to me anyway. I hadn't seen it. -- Frankly, I was very impressed. It's a good piece of work. Overall, I liked it a lot. There was one thing, however, that bugged me, and has bugged me in the Breed Standards for many a year now, but no matter how much I griped about it, nothing has changed. --

What I don't like and what I think is misleading and inadequate is the description of what the Evaluators are looking for when a Fjordhorse is trotted out for them.

First of all is the description of the trot ----

The Evaluation Handbook says the trot is . . . "A true two-beat gait. Being a powerful gait, the trot demonstrates the characteristic traits of speed, comfort and athletic ability. The trot comes naturally and is the most favored gait of the horse."

I honestly think this is an inadequate description and should be evised. -- The trot should be "a powerful gait", but NOT necessarily a speedy gait. -- In my opinion, the trot should clearly show the power of the horse's hindquarters in the way he thrusts forward . . . The way he propels the movement forward. -- It does not need to be fast. It does need to be powerful and forward. -- Forward is not necessarily fast. -- I think this part is very unclear, and would lead some people who do not understand horse movement to simply push their horses for speed.

And, I'm sorry, but I don't understand the reference to "COMFORT". I guess it means that the horse should be comfortable to sit to at the trot. -- Yes, this is great, but sometimes a big mover who is a very correct and very good mover is not comfortable to sit to. Not because he's jarring and rough, but simply because he has a very big stride. -- This is the case with some big moving Warmbloods, and there are some Fjords who have this same kind of movement.

The last thing that I object to is the mention of "EXTRAVAGANT MOVEMENT" being undesirable. I find this in two places in the Handbook. -- What exactly does the Handbook mean by "extravagant movement."? -- In the beginning of the handbook, the writers explain how breed type and overall conformation is most important, and that "extravagant movement" (they also mention beauty and elegance) should never override the importance of type and conformation. -- I totally agree with this! I agree that no one thing such as a beautiful head, or a huge trot should ever override the importance placed on overall quality and breed type.

However, further on in the Handbook where the writers list UNDESIRABLE TRAITS, they again list "extravagant movement". -- I wish somebody would tell me what is meant by this.

* Does it mean high knee action like a Hackney, Saddlebred, or Morgan? -- If that's what it means, then I agree. Fjords should not move with high knee action. This is a big fault. Fjords should move like Warmbloods with a long, reaching stride. --- If the Evaluation Committee means high knee action when they speak of "extravagant movement", then they should say it like that. HIGH KNEE ACTION is a fault in Fjords.

* Does extravagant movement mean a horse capable of giving a big extension at the trot? -- If that's what the Handbook means then, I beg to differ most vociferously. -- But, again, I do agree that a Fjord with a big extension at the trot should not be forgiven for lack of "breed type" or faults of conformation.

The thing is that if a Fjord is capable of doing a big extended trot, and he has all the other qualities . . . . What I want to know is if such a orse --with all the other desirable qualities -- is going to get marked down because he has a big extended trot? -- Is it a fault? -- I sure hope not!

I hope the Evaluation Committee can answer this for me.

And I also hope that they will revise the Handbook in this regard to make the issue clearer for everybody.

Kind Regards, Carol Rivoire


Reply via email to